Methods And Microorganisms For The Production Of 1,3-Butanediol

ABSTRACT

A non-naturally occurring microorganism having a 1,3-BDO pathway is provided. The microorganism expresses at least one of the following 1,3-BDO pathway enzymes: an aldolase that catalyzes condensation of two acetaldehydes to produce 3-hydroxybutanal; and an aldo-ketoreductase, oxidoreductase, aldehyde reductase or alcohol dehydrogenase that reduces 3-hydroxybutanal to 1,3-BDO. The organism may further express one or more enzymes for producing acetaldehyde. A biosynthetic process involves condensing two acetaldehyde molecules to 3-hydroxybutanal using an enzyme from class aldolases; and selectively reducing 3-hydroxybutanal to 1,3-BDO using an enzyme belonging to the class aldo-ketoreductase, oxidoreductase, aldehyde reductase or alcohol dehydrogenase. The process can further include producing acetaldehyde by a biosynthetic method.

RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/746,241, filed Jan. 19, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,626,423, which is the U.S. National Stage of International Application No. PCT/CA2016/050858, filed on Jul. 21, 2016, published in English, which claims the benefit of U.S. Application No. 62/195,011, filed on Jul. 21, 2015. The entire teachings of the above application(s) are incorporated herein by reference.

INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE OF MATERIAL IN ASCII TEXT FILE

This application incorporates by reference the Sequence Listing contained in the following ASCII text file:

a) File name: 20200422SubstituteSequenceListing.txt; created Jun. 11, 2020, 96 KB in size.

The present application includes as part of its description a sequence listing that includes 59 sequences and which was filed with this application in electronic form and this sequence listing is incorporated into the present application in its entirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to biosynthetic processes for producing organic compounds, including 1,3-butanediol (1,3-BDO).

BACKGROUND OF THE ART

1,3-butanediol may be used as a precursor to 1,3-butadiene, a common commodity chemical with an annual global market of around 22 billion USD. 1,3-butadiene is an important building block used to produce rubber, latex, resins, and plastics. Currently, 1,3-butadiene is produced using petroleum-based processes. Recently, large interest has been focused on producing 1,3-butanediol using a biotechnological route, mainly due to the opportunity to produce 1,3-butadiene catalytically from 1,3-butanediol. In addition to being a precursor to 1,3-butadiene, 1,3-butanediol finds applications in cosmetic and pharmaceutical products. The enantiopure form of 1,3-butanediol, such as (R)-1,3-butanediol, can be used to synthesize high-value compounds such as pheromones, fragrances, and insecticides. Techniques for 1,3-butanediol production continue to be sought.

SUMMARY

In one aspect, there is provided a non-naturally occurring microorganism having a 1,3-BDO pathway. The microorganism includes at least one of the following 1,3-BDO pathway enzymes: an aldolase that catalyzes condensation of two acetaldehydes to produce 3-hydroxybutanal; and an aldo-ketoreductase, oxidoreductase, aldehyde reductase or alcohol dehydrogenase that reduces 3-hydroxybutanal to 1,3-BDO. The microorganism has at least one exogenous nucleic acid encoding an enzyme from said 1,3-BDO pathway.

In one embodiment, the non-naturally occurring microorganism includes at least one modification to an endogenous nucleic acid encoding an enzyme from the 1,3-BDO pathway or affecting the expression of an enzyme from this 1,3-BDO pathway.

In one embodiment, the microorganism has an exogenous nucleic acid that encodes the aldolase. In one embodiment, the exogenous nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10. In one embodiment, the aldolase is deoxyribose-5-phosphate aldolase (DERA). In one embodiment, the aldolase comprises an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, or 24 or active fragment or homologue thereof. In one embodiment, the aldolase enzyme includes the following conserved amino acid residues in the active site of the enzyme: lysine 167, lysine 201, aspartic acid 16 and aspartic acid 102, where the number associated with each residue refers to the residue number in the amino acid sequence of E. coli DERA of the SEQ ID NO. 20.

In one embodiment, the microorganism includes an exogenous nucleic acid that encodes the aldo-ketoreductase, oxidoreductase, aldehyde reductase or alcohol dehydrogenase. In one embodiment, the microorganism expresses an aldo-keto reductase comprising an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 25 or active fragment or homologue thereof. In one embodiment, the aldo-ketoreductase, oxidoreductase, aldehyde reductase or alcohol dehydrogenase includes the following conserved residues in the NADP binding pocket and active site: Arg214, Arg227, Arg281, Gln285, Gly279, Arg208 where the second number refers to the amino acid residue in the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID 25. In one embodiment, the exogenous nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO. 11.

In one embodiment, the non-naturally occurring microorganism further includes: a decarboxylase capable of the decarboxylation of pyruvate to yield acetaldehyde and carbon dioxide In various embodiments, the decarboxylase comprises a pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC), which may comprise an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 26 or an active fragment or homologue thereof, benzoylformate decarboxylase (BFD), which may comprises an amino acid sequence or SEQ ID NO: 27 or active fragment or homologue thereof, or alpha-detoacid decarboxylase (KDC), which may comprise an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 28 or active fragment or homologue thereof. The microorganism may alternatively or further express an enzyme identified in Table 3.

In one embodiment, one or more genes encoding an enzyme that utilizes pyruvate are deleted from the non-naturally occurring microorganism as compared to wild-type. In one embodiment, one or more genes encoding an alcohol dehydrogenase, a lactate dehydrogenase, or a pyruvate formate lyase are deleted from the non-naturally occurring microorganism as compared to wild-type.

Also provided is a method for producing 1,3-BDO that includes culturing a microorganism as described herein under conditions and for a sufficient period to time to produce 1,3-BDO. In one embodiment, the method is performed in a substantially anaerobic culture medium.

Also provided is a biosynthetic process that includes: condensing two acetaldehyde molecules to 3-hydroxybutanal using an enzyme from class aldolases; and selectively reducing 3-hydroxybutanal to 1,3-BDO using an enzyme belonging to the class aldo-ketoreductase, oxidoreductase, aldehyde reductase or alcohol dehydrogenase. In one embodiment, the process further includes producing acetaldehyde by a biosynthetic method. In one embodiment, the process further includes decarboxylating a pyruvate to obtain the acetaldehyde.

Also provided is a method of producing enantiopure (R)-1,3-BDO comprising culturing a non-naturally occurring microorganism as described herein or performing the biosynthetic process as described herein.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a schematic of the conversion of acetaldehyde to 1,3-BDO according to one aspect of the present invention.

FIG. 2 shows the synthetic pathway for 1,3-butanediol production using glucose that may be implemented by genetically modified E. coli.

FIG. 3 schematically shows five published pathways for producing 1,3-BDO using fermentation.

FIG. 4 schematically shows a multiple sequence alignment of fifteen DERA (deoxyribose-5-phosphate aldolase) enzymes using MAFFT. A BLOSUM62 matrix was used. Five residues that lie in the phosphate-binding pocket of DERA are highlighted by the boxes and are based on comparison to TM1559 and EC1535. These residues are conserved to those found in DERA from Thermotoga maritima (TM1559), but differ to DERA from Escherichia coli (EC1535).

FIG. 5 schematically shows a multiple sequence alignment of fifteen DERA enzymes using MAFFT. A BLOSUM62 matrix was used. Four residues that lie in the active site and that play a role in forming the required Schiff-based intermediate with the donor acetaldehyde are highlighted by the boxes and are based on comparison to TM1559 and EC1535. These residues are strictly conserved in all DERA enzymes (except for D16 (number refers to EC1535 sequence) which is conserved in all sequences except for TM1559 which has a glycine residue).

FIG. 6 schematically shows a multiple sequence alignment of aldo-keto reductases.

FIG. 7 schematically shows a multiple sequence alignment of three decarboxylases.

FIG. 8 schematically shows the results from screening ten aldolases, each from a different species, for acetaldehyde aldol condensation. The specific activity was determined from the change in acetaldehyde condensation over 5 hours in a reaction mixture containing 0.8 mg of each enzyme. The screened aldolases include DERA from E. coli (EC1535), from Bacillus cereus (BCE1975), Bacillus halodurans (BH1352), and Bacillus subtilis (BSU3938).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure describes non-naturally occurring microorganisms that are engineered by expressing genes encoding enzymes involved in a novel biochemical pathway for conversion of acetaldehyde to 1,3-butanediol (1,3-BDO). The present disclosure also describes additional genetic modifications that can be used to improve the performance of the 1,3-BDO production pathway. The genetic modifications can be towards optimizing the expression system or to the non-natural organism for improvement of production metrics including yield, titre, and productivity. Additionally, genetic modifications can be aimed at improving the non-natural microorganism's characteristics including but not limited to tolerance to inhibitors found in the feedstocks, product tolerance, osmotolerance, and efficient product secretion.

Definitions

As used herein, the terms 1,3-BDO is used to refer to 1,3-butanediol, which is also known as butylene glycol, 1,3-butylene glycol, butane-1,3-diol, 1,3-dihydroxybutane, and in enantiopure form either as (R)-1,3-butanediol or (S)-1,3-butanediol.

As used herein, the terms 3-HB and 3HB have been used interchangeably to refer to 3-hydroxybutanal, which is also known as 3-hydroxybutaraldehyde, hydroxybutyraldehyde, and in enantiopure form as (R)-3-hydroxybutanal or (S)-3-hydroxybutanal.

As used herein, the term DERA refers to the enzyme deoxyribose-5-phosphate aldolase belonging to the class aldolases, the term AKR refers to the class aldo-ketoreductase, the term ADH refers to the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase, the term PDC refers to the enzyme pyruvate decarboxylase, the term BFD refers to the enzyme benzoylformate decarboxylase, and the term KDC refers to the enzyme alpha-ketoacid decarboxylase,

As used herein “enzyme” includes proteins produced by a cell capable of catalyzing biochemical reactions. Further, unless context dictates otherwise, as used herein “enzyme” includes protein fragments that retain the relevant catalytic activity, and may include artificial enzymes synthesized to retain the relevant catalytic activity.

The expression “derived from” in relation to an enzyme or (poly)peptide denotes that the enzyme or poly(peptide) was isolated from a (micro)organism or that it includes all or a biologically active part of the amino acid sequence of an enzyme or (poly)peptide isolated or characterized from such a (micro)organism.

As used herein, the term “microorganism” is intended to mean any organism that exists as a microscopic cell and encompasses prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells or organisms having a microscopic size and includes bacteria, archaea and eubacteria of all species as well as eukaryotic microorganisms such as yeast and fungi. The term also includes cell cultures of any species (including e.g. plant and mammalian cells) that can be cultured for the production of a biochemical.

As used herein, the term “non-naturally occurring” when used in reference to a microorganism refers to a microorganism that has at least one genetic alteration not normally found in a naturally occurring strain of the referenced species, including wild-type strains of the referenced species. Genetic alterations include, for example, modifications introducing expressible nucleic acids encoding metabolic polypeptides, other nucleic acid additions, nucleic acid deletions and/or other functional disruption of the microbial genetic material. Such modifications include, for example, coding regions and functional fragments thereof, for heterologous, homologous or both heterologous and homologous polypeptides for the referenced species. Additional modifications include, for example, non-coding regulatory regions in which the modifications alter expression of a gene or operon.

The term “endogenous” refers to a referenced molecule or activity that originates in a host microorganism. Similarly, the term when used in reference to expression of an encoding nucleic acid refers to expression of an encoding nucleic acid contained within the microorganism.

As used herein the term “exogenous” refers to molecules or activity that is introduced into a host microorganism. The molecule can be introduced, for example, by introduction of an encoding nucleic acid into the host genetic material such as by integration into a host chromosome or as non-chromosomal genetic material such as a plasmid. In reference to expression of an encoding nucleic acid the term refers to introduction of the encoding nucleic acid in an expressible form into the microorganism. When used in reference to a biosynthetic activity, the term refers to an activity that is introduced into a reference host organism. The source can be, for example, an encoding nucleic acid that expresses the activity following introduction into the host microorganism.

As used herein, “homologue” refers to a protein that is functionally equivalent i.e. has the same enzymatic activity as an enzyme having an amino acid sequence of the specified sequence identification number, but may have a limited number of amino acid substitutions, deletions, insertions or additions in the amino acid sequence. In order to maintain the function of the protein, the substitutions may be conservative substitutions, replacing an amino acid with one having similar properties.

In various aspects, a homologue of each enzyme refers to a protein which has an identity of at least 25%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90%, at least 95% or at least 99% with the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO corresponding to the enzyme and retains enzymatic activity. Algorithms for determining sequence identity are publicly available and include e.g. BLAST available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). One skilled in the art can determine if the sequences are similar to a degree that indicates homology and thus similar or identical function.

A person skilled in the art can obtain a polynucleotide encoding a homologue of each enzyme by appropriately introducing substitution, deletion, insertion, and/or addition to the DNA of the enzyme which is composed of a nucleotide sequence disclosed herein, using methods such as site-specific mutagenesis (Nucleic Acid Res. 10, pp. 6487 (1982), Methods in Enzymol. 100, pp. 448 (1983), Molecular Cloning 2nd Edt., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press (1989), PCR A Practical Approach IRL Press pp. 200 (1991)). The polynucleotide encoding a homologue of each enzyme can be introduced and expressed in a host to obtain the homologue.

Each of the enzymes described herein can be attached to an additional amino acid sequence as long as it retains an activity functionally equivalent to that of the enzyme. As mentioned above, it is understood that each enzyme or a homologue thereof may be a (poly)peptide fragment as long as it retains an activity functionally equivalent to that of the enzyme.

The term “heterologous” refers to a molecule or activity derived from a source other than the referenced species whereas “homologous” refers to a molecule or activity derived from the host microbial organism. Accordingly, exogenous expression of an encoding nucleic acid of the invention can use either or both a heterologous or homologous encoding nucleic acid.

As used herein, the term “operably linked” refers to a linkage between one or more expression control sequences and the coding region in a polynucleotide to be expressed in such a way that expression is achieved under conditions compatible with the expression control sequence.

1,3-BDO is used as an intermediate in the manufacture of polyester plasticizers and also finds use as solvent for flavors in food industry and in cosmetic industry applications. Additionally, optically pure (R)-1,3-BDO is used in synthesis of various optically active compounds such as pheromones, fragrances, and insecticides, and is an intermediate for synthesis of penems and carbepenems antibiotics [Zheng, R.-C., Ge, Z., Qiu, Z.-K., Wang, Y.-S. & Zheng, Y.-G. Asymmetric synthesis of (R)-1,3-butanediol from 4-hydroxy-2-butanone by a newly isolated strain Candida krusei ZJB-09162. Applied microbiology and biotechnology 94, 969-76 (2012)].

1,3-BDO may be produced using biotechnological route, mainly due to the opportunity for production of 1,3-butadiene catalytically from 1,3-BDO [Burgard, A. P., Burk, M. J. & Pharkya, P. Methods and organisms for converting synthesis gas or other gaseous carbon sources and methanol to 13 butanediol. (2011)]. 1,3-butadiene is a building block chemical with a potential market of over $22 billion USD, and may be used to manufacture rubber, latex and resins, and articles including one or more of these, for examples tires. Non-limiting examples of products produced using 1,3-BDO as a component or intermediate include organic solvents, polyurethane resins, polyester resins, and hypoglycaemic agents. Accordingly, in some embodiments, there is provided organic solvents, polyurethane resins, polyester resins, and hypoglycaemic agents having 1,3-BDO prepared according to processes described herein as a component or produced using 1,3-BDO prepared according to processes described herein as an intermediate.

In one aspect, there is provided a novel pathway for producing 1,3-BDO using enzymatic transformation using acetaldehyde as a precursor.

In one aspect, a pathway is disclosed that comprises: condensation of two acetaldehyde molecules to 3-hydroxybutanal using an enzyme from class aldolases; and selective reduction of 3-hydroxybutanal to 1,3-BDO using an enzyme belonging to the class aldo-ketoreductase/oxidoreductase/aldehyde reductase/alcohol dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.a). FIG. 1 shows the schematic of this pathway.

In another aspect, a pathway is disclosed that comprises: the production of acetaldehyde according to one or more of the pathways described below; condensation of two acetaldehyde molecules to 3-hydroxybutanal using an enzyme from class aldolases; and selective reduction of 3-hydroxybutanal to 1,3-BDO using an enzyme belonging to the class aldo-ketoreductase/oxidoreductase/aldehyde reductase/alcohol dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.a). See FIG. 2.

In some embodiments, the intermediate 3-hydroxybutanal produced from the novel pathway is in enantiomeric excess.

In some embodiments, the enantiomer of 3-hydroxybutanal produced in excess is (R)-3-hydroxybutanal.

In some embodiments, 1,3-BDO produced from the novel pathway is in enantiomeric excess.

In some embodiments, the enantiomer of 1,3-BDO produced in excess is (R)-1,3-BDO.

In contrast to published multistep pathways, which require at least 4-5 steps, each catalyzed by a heterologous enzyme for the production of 1,3-BDO (FIG. 3 shows examples of such pathways), this pathway is shorter, requiring only two simple enzyme-catalyzed steps for the synthesis of 1,3-BDO. Further, most of the previously described pathways use precursors that are difficult to synthesize such as alanine, 4-hydroxybutyryl-CoA etc. The precursor acetaldehyde is advantageous in that it is simple to achieve high flux towards, as it is already present in the central carbon metabolism of both Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

In one aspect, a process is disclosed comprising, consisting of, or consisting essentially of condensing two aldehyde molecules using an aldolase enzyme as described herein.

The aldolases catalyze aldol condensation by stereocontrolled addition of a nucleophilic donor onto an electrophilic aldehyde acceptor. Due to the mechanistic requirements aldolases are quite specific for the nucleophilic donor component but show large flexibility in the acceptor range. Hence aldolases are categorized based on their nucleophilic donors. Different classes of aldolases are 1) acetaldehyde-dependent aldolase, 2) pyruvate/phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent aldolases, 3) dihydroxyacetone phosphate/dihydroxyacetone-dependent aldolases, and 4) glycine dependent aldolases.

In some embodiments, aldolases may be acetaldehyde dependent aldolases.

In some embodiments, the aldehydes may be donors or acceptors.

In some embodiments, the donors may include acetaldehyde (ethanal), propanal, 2-methylpropanal, methylglyoxal, lactaldehyde, glycolaldehyde, or acrolein.

In some embodiments, the donors may be non-aldehydes including pyruvate, propanone (acetone), glyoxylic acid, or 3-propenol.

In some embodiments, the acceptors may include one or more of acetaldehyde (ethanal), propanal, butanal, isobutanal, 2-methyl-1-butanal, 3-methyl-1-butanal, pentanal, hexanal, 3-methyl-1-pentanal, 4-methyl-1-pentanal, succinate semialdehyde, lactaldehyde, glycoldehyde, glyceraldehyde, 2-phenylacetaldehyde, cinnamaldehyde, glyoxal, glyoxylic acid, methyl glyoxal, acrolein, succindialdehyde, glutaraldehyde, adipaldehyde, malondialdehyde, malonic semialdehyde (3-oxopropionic acid), muconate semialdehyde, or 2-hydroxymuconate semialdehyde.

As described above, the condensation of two acetaldehyde molecules to 3-hydroxybutanal may be performed using an enzyme from class aldolases. In one embodiment, the enzyme from the class aldolases is a deoxyribose-5-phosphate aldolase (DERA) (EC 4.1.2.4.).

In some embodiments, DERA enzymes can be described as class I aldolases that form covalent Schiff base intermediates. In all studied structures, DERA adopts the classical eight-bladed TIM barrel fold. The oligomerisation state of DERA seems to depend on the temperature of the organism. For example, DERA from E. coli is a homodimer, whereas DERA from Thermotoga maritima is a homotetramer. The degree of oligomerization does not seem to affect catalysis but may affect stability under various conditions.

In one aspect, DERAs as described herein are derived from microorganisms of the genus Bacillus, Escherichia, Thermotoga, Deinococcus, Listeria, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Methanothermobacter. In certain embodiments, the DERA is derived from Bacillus halodurans, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Thermotoga maritima, Deinococcus radiodurans, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumonia, and Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus. In one aspect, a DERA as used in a process described herein comprises an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, or 24 or active fragment or homologue thereof.

In some embodiments, the DERA is an enzyme comprising an amino acid sequence encoded by a DNA which comprises the nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10.

In one aspect, the aldolase enzyme comprises the following conserved amino acid residues in the active site of the enzyme: lysine 167, lysine 201, aspartic acid 16 and aspartic acid 102, where the number associated with each residue refers to the residue number in the amino acid sequence of E. coli DERA of the SEQ ID NO. 20 and corresponding codons in the nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO 2. FIG. 4 shows a multiple sequence alignment of the various DERA enzymes and highlights in boxes the key conserved residues described above, while FIG. 5 highlights the conserved residues in some DERA enzymes that may confer optimal acetaldehyde aldol condensation when compared to E. coli DERA.

In one aspect, enzymes belong to the Pfam database [Finn R. D. et al., Pfam: the protein families database Nucl. Acids Res. (1 Jan. 2014) 42 (D1): D222-D230] group PF01791 (DeoC/LacD family aldolase) include deoxyribose-5-phosphate aldolases, which also belong to the InterPro family IPR002915, IPR013785, IPR011343, and IPR028581. One skilled in the art can obtain protein sequences that belong to the InterPro and Pfam family of proteins such that they are homologues of DERA described herein.

The reduction of 3-hydroxybutanaldehyde to 1,3-BDO may be carried out by using appropriate alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), aldo-ketoreductases, oxidoreductase, or aldehyde reductase using a reducing equivalent as cofactor, which in one embodiment, may be NADH or NADPH. In one embodiment, the ADH, AKR, oxidoreductase, or aldehyde reductase, however, is substantially specific towards 3-hydroxybutyraldehyde and does not act on acetaldehyde, thereby substantially avoiding or eliminating the production of ethanol as a side product.

In some embodiments, sources of encoding nucleic acids for the pathway enzymes described herein are not particularly restricted and may include any species where the encoded gene product can catalyze the relevant reaction. The enzymes may be derived from but not limited to the following species: Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus halodurans, Bacillus subtilis, Helicobacter pylori, Lactobacillus brevis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas synringae, Rhodopseudomonas palustris, Salmonella typhimurium, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Clostridium acetobutylicum. TABLE 1 includes exemplary aldo-keto reductase enzymes.

TABLE 1 GI PROTEIN GENEBANK ID NUMBER ORGANISM AKR11B CAB12792.1 2633288 Bacillus subtilis PA1127 NP_249818.1 15596324 Pseudomonas aeruginosa AKR WP_010898315 499200775 Bacillus halodurans AKR NP_790200 28867581 Pseudomonas syringae

In one aspect, enzymes described herein can belong to the InterPro superfamily family IPR023210, IPR001395, IPR018170, and IPR020471, which describes the aldo-keto reductase family of enzymes that possess a beta-alpha-beta fold which comprises a parallel 8 beta/alpha barrel which contains the NADP-binding motif.

In one aspect, there is provided an alcohol dehydrogenase, aldo-keto reductases (AKR), oxidoreductase, or aldehyde reductase capable of selectively reducing 3-hydroxybutanal to 1,3-BDO. In one aspect, the source of this enzyme is not particularly restricted.

In one aspect, the enzymes described herein comprises the following conserved residues in the NADP binding pocket and active site: Arg214, Arg227, Arg281, Gln285, Gly279, Arg208 where the second number refers to the amino acid residue in the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID 25. The described key residues conserved among two exemplary aldo-keto reductases are shown in a multiple sequence alignment in FIG. 6.

In one aspect, aldo-keto reductases (AKRs) as described herein are derived from microoganisms of the genus Pseudomonas. In one aspect, an AKR as provided herein is derived from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. In one aspect, an AKR as used in a process described herein comprises an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 25 or active fragment or homologue thereof.

In some embodiments, the AKR is an enzyme comprising an amino acid sequence encoded by a DNA which comprises the nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO. 11.

The starting metabolite of the two-step pathway is acetaldehyde which is a common central metabolite, or may be produced by decarboxylation of pyruvate.

In some embodiments, acetaldehyde is produced by the decarboxylation of pyruvate by pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC) (EC 4.1.1.1) to yield acetaldehyde and carbon dioxide. PDC from S. cerevisiae has a broad substrate range for aliphatic 2-keto acids. It has been extensively studied, engineered and expressed in E. coli [Candy, J. M., Duggleby, R. G., & Mattick, J. S. (1991). Expression of active yeast pyruvate decarboxylase in. Journal of General Microbiology, (137), 5-9; Killenberg-Jabs, M., Konig, S., Hohmann, S., & Hubner, G. (1996). Purification and characterisation of the pyruvate decarboxylase from a haploid strain of S. cerevisiae. Biological Chemistry Hoppe-Seyler, 377(5), 313-7. PDC from Zymomonas mobilis also has a broad substrate range for 2-keto acids, and has been extensively studied and expressed in Escherichia coli [Pohl, M., Siegert, P., Mesch, K., Bruhn, H., & Grotzinger, J. (1998). Active site mutants of pyruvate decarboxylase from Zymomonas mobilis. Eur. J. Biochem., 257, 538-546; Candy, J. M., Koga, J., Nixon, P. F., & Duggleby, R. G. (1996). The role of residues glutamate-50 and phenylalanine-496 in Zymomonas mobilis pyruvate decarboxylase. The Biochemical Journal, 315, Pt 3, 745-51. Conway, T., Osman, Y. a, Konnan, J. I., Hoffmann, E. M., & Ingram, L. O. (1987). Promoter and nucleotide sequences of the Zymomonas mobilis pyruvate decarboxylase. Journal of Bacteriology, 169(3), 949-54. Siegert, P., Mesch, K., & Bruhn, H. (1998). Active site mutants of pyruvate decarboxylase from Zymomonas mobilis. Eur. J. Biochem., 257, 538-546.]. The sequence identifiers for the exemplary PDC described herein can be found in the TABLE 2 and searched for using the GenBank accession number.

TABLE 2 GI PROTEIN GENEBANK ID NUMBER ORGANISM PDC WP_011241152 499560369 Zymomonas mobilis PDC P06169.7 30923172 Saccharomyces cerevisiae PDC AEE86169 332660769 Arabidopsis thaliana PDC KLA18896 821638028 Bacillus cereus

In one aspect, PDCs as described herein are derived from microorganisms of the genus Zymomonas. In one aspect the PDC is derived from Zymomonas mobilis. In one aspect, a PDC as used in a process described herein comprises an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 26 or active fragment or homologue thereof.

In one embodiment, the PDC is an enzyme comprising an amino acid sequence encoded by a DNA which comprises the nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 12.

Pyruvate decarboxylase that have also been shown to act on pyruvate for the production of acetaldehyde include but not limited to benzoylformate decarboxylase (BFD) (EC 4.1.1.7) derived from Pseudomonas putida and branched chain alpha-ketoacid decarboxylase (KDC) derived from Lactococcus lactis [Gocke, D., Graf, T., Brosi, H., Frindi-Wosch, I., Walter, L., Müller, M., & Pohl, M. (2009). Comparative characterisation of thiamine diphosphate-dependent decarboxylases. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, 61(1-2), 30-35]. In addition, mutants of PDC and BFD have been generated by site-directed mutagenesis including but not limited to: PDC I472A, PDC I476F, PDC I472A/I476F, BFD A4601, BFD F4641, and BFD A460I/F464I, have also shown activity on pyruvate towards acetaldehyde formation [Siegert, P., McLeish, M. J., Baumann, M., Iding, H., Kneen, M. M., Kenyon, G. L., & Pohl, M. (2005). Exchanging the substrate specificities of pyruvate decarboxylase from Zymomonas mobilis and benzoylformate decarboxylase from Pseudomonas putida. Protein Engineering, Design & Selection: PEDS, 18(7), 345-57].

In one embodiment, the BFD described herein comprises an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 27 or active fragment or homologue thereof, and that of the KDC of SEQ ID NO: 28 or active fragment or homologue thereof.

In one embodiment, the BFD is an enzyme comprising an amino acid sequence encoded by a DNA which comprises the nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 13.

In one embodiment, the KDC is an enzyme comprising an amino acid sequence encoded by a DNA which comprises the nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 14.

In other embodiments, homologues of enzymes described herein may be used in processes as described herein. FIG. 7 shows a multiple sequence alignment of PDC, BFD, and KDC described herein and highlights the protein domains required for the decarboxylation activity.

While in certain embodiments, acetaldehyde is obtained by the decarboxylation of pyruvate by PDC, in other embodiments, acetaldehyde is (alternatively or additionally) obtained by one or more of the reaction pathways identified in TABLE 3 below.

TABLE 3 KEGG REACTION ID ENZYME NAME EC NUMBER REACTION R00025 ethylnitronate:oxygen 2- 1.13.12.16 Ethylnitronate + Oxygen + Reduced oxidoreductase (nitrite-forming) FMN <=> Acetaldehyde + Nitrite + FMN + H2O R00224 pyruvate carboxy-lyase 4.1.1.1 Pyruvate <=> Acetaldehyde + CO2 (acetaldehyde-forming) R00228 acetaldehyde:NAD+ 1.2.1.10 Acetaldehyde + CoA + NAD+ <=> oxidoreductase (CoA-acetylating) Acetyl-CoA + NADH + H+ R00326 acetaldehyde:acceptor 1.2.99.6 Acetaldehyde + Acceptor + H2O <=> oxidoreductase Acetate + Reduced acceptor R00710 Acetaldehyde:NAD+ 1.2.1.3, Acetaldehyde + NAD+ + H2O <=> oxidoreductase 1.2.1.5 Acetate + NADH + H+ R00711 Acetaldehyde:NADP+ 1.2.1.4, Acetaldehyde + NADP+ + H2O <=> oxidoreductase 1.2.1.5, Acetate + NADPH + H+ 1.2.1.- R00746 Ethanol:NADP+ oxidoreductase 1.1.1.2, Ethanol + NADP+ <=> 1.1.1.71 Acetaldehyde + NADPH + H+ R00747 2-Phosphonoacetaldehyde 3.11.1.1 Phosphonoacetaldehyde + H2O <=> phosphonohydrolase Acetaldehyde + Orthophosphate R00748 ethanolamine-phosphate 4.2.3.2 Ethanolamine phosphate + H2O <=> phosphate-lyase (deaminating; Acetaldehyde + Ammonia + acetaldehyde-forming) Orthophosphate R00749 ethanolamine ammonia-lyase 4.3.1.7 Ethanolamine <=> Acetaldehyde + (acetaldehyde-forming) Ammonia R00750 4-hydroxy-2-oxopentanoate 4.1.3.39 Acetaldehyde + Pyruvate <=> 4- pyruvate-lyase (acetaldehyde- Hydroxy-2-oxopentanoate forming) R00751 L-threonine acetaldehyde-lyase 4.1.2.5 L-Threonine <=> Glycine + (glycine-forming) Acetaldehyde R00753 (S)-lactate acetaldehyde-lyase 4.1.2.36 (S)-Lactate <=> Formate + (formate-forming) Acetaldehyde R00754 ethanol:NAD+ oxidoreductase 1.1.1.1, Ethanol + NAD+ <=> 1.1.1.71 Acetaldehyde + NADH + H+ R00755 Pyruvate decarboxylase, TPP 4.1.1.1 Acetaldehyde + Thiamin dependent reaction diphosphate <=> 2-(alpha- Hydroxyethyl)thiamine diphosphate R00799 Nitroethane:oxygen 1.7.3.1 Nitrite + Acetaldehyde + Hydrogen oxidoreductase peroxide <=> Nitroethane + Oxygen + H2O R01019 acetaldehyde:pyrroloquinoline- 1.2.99.3 PQQ + Acetaldehyde + H2O <=> quinone oxidoreductase PQQH2 + Acetate R01066 2-deoxy-D-ribose-5-phosphate 4.1.2.4 2-Deoxy-D-ribose 5-phosphate <=> acetaldehyde-lyase (D- D-Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate + glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate- Acetaldehyde forming) R01410 Hydrogen cyanide + Acetaldehyde + Ammonia <=> alpha- Aminopropiononitrile + H2O R01841 17alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone 4.1.2.30 17alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone <=> acetaldehyde-lyase Androstenedione + Acetaldehyde R02345 3-Hydroxybutan-2-one:D-ribose-5- 2.2.1.4 Acetoin + D-Ribose 5-phosphate <=> phosphate aldehydetransferase Acetaldehyde + 1-Deoxy-D- altro-heptulose 7-phosphate R03723 24R,24(1)R)-fucosterol-epoxide 4.1.2.33 ((24R,24(1)R)-Fucosterol epoxide <=> acetaldehyde-lyase (desmosterol- Desmosterol + Acetaldehyde forming) R05198 ethanol:cytochrome c 1.1.2.8 Ethanol + 2 Ferricytochrome c <=> oxidoreductase 2 Ferrocytochrome c + Acetaldehyde + 2 H+ R05380 acetaldehyde hydro-lyase 4.2.1.112 Acetaldehyde <=> Acetylene + H2O R05381 diethanolamine ethanolamine- 4.3.3.- Ethanolamine + Acetaldehyde <=> lyase (acetaldehyde-forming) Diethanolamine R05382 triethanolamine diethanolamine- 4.3.3.- Triethanolamine <=> lyase (acetaldehyde-forming) Diethanolamine + Acetaldehyde R05565 1.14.15.- 2 Atrazine + Oxygen <=> 2 Deethylatrazine + 2 Acetaldehyde R05567 1.14.15.- 2 Deisopropylatrazine + Oxygen <=> 2 Deisopropyldeethylatrazine + 2 Acetaldehyde R05811 2.1.1.- Cobalt-precorrin 5 + S-Adenosyl-L- methionine + H2O <=> Cobalt- precorrin 6 + S-Adenosyl-L- homocysteine + Acetaldehyde R06171 L-allo-threonine acetaldehyde- 4.1.2.5, L-Allothreonine <=> Glycine + lyase (glycine-forming) 4.1.2.49 Acetaldehyde R06973 4.1.1.- 3-Oxopropanoate <=> Acetaldehyde + CO2 R07247 fluoroacetaldehyde:L-threonine 2.2.1.8 L-Threonine + Fluoroacetaldehyde <=> aldehydetransferase Acetaldehyde + 4-Fluoro-L- threonine R07772 cobalt-precorrin 5A acylhydrolase 3.7.1.12 Cobalt-precorrin 5A + H2O <=> Cobalt-precorrin 5B + Acetaldehyde R08195 D-threonine acetaldehyde-lyase 4.1.2.42 D-Threonine <=> Glycine + (glycine-forming) Acetaldehyde R08196 D-Allothreonine <=> Glycine + Acetaldehyde R08516 17alpha-Hydroxypregnenolone 4.1.2.30 17alpha-Hydroxypregnenolone ⇔ acetaldehyde-lyase Dehydroepiandrosterone + Acetaldehyde R09127 ethanol:cytochrome c 1.1.2.7 Ethanol + 2 Ferricytochrome cL <=> oxidoreductase Acetaldehyde + 2 Ferrocytochrome cL + 2 H+ R09156 chloroethane, donor:oxygen 1.13.12.-, Chloroethane + Oxygen + Reduced oxidoreductase (dechlorinating, 1.14.99.39 acceptor <=> Acetaldehyde + acetaldehyde-forming) Hydrochloric acid + Acceptor + H2O R09479 ethanol:quinone oxidoreductase 1.1.5.5 Ethanol + Ubiquinone <=> Acetaldehyde + Ubiquinol R09524 acetyl-CoA:acetoin O- 2.3.1.190 Acetoin + CoA + NAD+ <=> acetyltransferase Acetaldehyde + Acetyl-CoA + NADH + H+ R09552 ethanol:N,N-dimethyl-4- 1.1.99.36 Ethanol + N,N-Dimethyl-4- nitrosoaniline oxidoreductase nitrosoaniline <=> Acetaldehyde + 4-(Hydroxylamino)-N,N- dimethylaniline R09959 7,8-dihydroneopterin 3′- 4.1.2.50 7.8-Dihydroneopterin 3′- triphosphate acetaldehyde-lyase triphosphate + H2O <=> 6-Carboxy- (6-carboxy-5,6,7,8- 5,6,7,8-tetrahydropterin + tetrahydropterin and triphosphate- Acetaldehyde + Triphosphate forming) R10285 choline trimethylamine-lyase 4.3.99.4 Choline <=> Trimethylamine + (acetaldehyde-forming) Acetaldehyde + H+ The reaction IDs refer to Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) as of 13^(th) May 2015.

In one embodiment, the processes as described herein are carried out with live cells. In other embodiments, the processes are carried out in vitro with lysed cells or with partially or substantially completely purified enzyme. In one embodiment, the processes are carried out with permeabilized cells. In other embodiments, methods are carried out in vitro and the enzyme is immobilized. Means and methods for immobilizing enzymes on different supports are well-known to the person skilled in the art.

Microorganisms expressing enzyme(s) as described herein may be provided in various forms, including live forms e.g. in in an aqueous solution or in culture medium or in “resting” forms such as in a freeze-dried or tablet form.

In one embodiment, the method is carried out in culture, with one or more host microorganisms, producing the pathway enzyme(s).

In one embodiment, there is provided a microorganism which is genetically modified so as to contain a nucleic acid molecule encoding an aldolase as described herein capable of condensing two acetaldehyde molecules.

In one embodiment, there is provided a non-naturally occurring microorganism having a 1,3-BDO pathway, wherein the microorganism comprises the following 1,3-BDO pathway enzymes: an aldolase that catalyzes condensation of two acetaldehydes to produce 3-hydroxybutanaldehyde; and an aldo-ketoreductase, oxidoreductase, aldehyde reductase or alcohol dehydrogenase that reduces 3-hydroxybutanaldehyde to 1,3-BDO; wherein the microorganism includes at least one exogenous nucleic acid encoding an enzyme from said 1,3-BDO pathway. In one embodiment, the microorganism further includes a PDC for decarboxylation of pyruvate to yield acetaldehyde and carbon dioxide. In one embodiment, the microorganism expresses an enzyme identified in Table 3 or an active fragment or homologue thereof for producing acetaldehyde. In one embodiment, more than one or all the nucleic acids are exogenous to the host microorganism.

In one embodiment, a microorganism used in a method according to one embodiment is a microorganism which is genetically modified so as to contain a nucleic acid molecule encoding an aldolase capable of condensing two acetaldehyde molecules to 3-hydroxybutanal. In one embodiment, the microoganism is genetically modified to contain a nucleic acid encoding a ketoreductase capable of reducing 3-hydroxybutanal to 1,3-BDO. In one embodiment, the microorganism is genetically modified to contain a nucleic acid encoding a PDC capable of decarboxylating pyruvate to yield acetaldehyde and carbon dioxide.

When reference is made to more than one exogenous nucleic acid being included in a microorganism, it is to be understood that this refers to the referenced encoding nucleic acids or biochemical activities and not the number of separate nucleic acids introduced into the host organism. As will be understood by those of skill in the art, such exogenous nucleic acids may be introduced into the host organism on separate nucleic acid molecules, on polycistronic nucleic acid molecules, or a combination thereof. For example, where two or more exogenous nucleic acids encoding different enzymatic activities are introduced into a host organism, the two or more exogenous nucleic acids can be introduced as a single nucleic acid, for example, on a single plasmid, on separate plasmids, can be integrated into the host chromosome at a single site or multiple sites, and still be considered as two or more exogenous nucleic acids.

As will be apparent to persons of skill in the art, depending on the host microorganism selected, nucleic acids for some or all of the 1,3-BDO pathway enzymes described can be introduced into the host organism. If the host microorganism endogenously expresses one or more of the pathway genes then it may not be necessary to introduce these genes, but only those nucleic acids encoding enzyme(s) in the pathway for which the microorganism is deficient. As will be apparent to persons of skill in the art, where a host microorganism is selected that expresses one or more of the pathway genes, the microorganism may be engineered such that the gene encoding the enzyme is overexpressed and/or genes encoding enzymes or proteins of competing pathways may be deleted.

As will be apparent to persons of skill in the art, the host microorganism can be engineered to increase co-factor pools of NADH and/or NADPH to improve metabolic flux towards 1,3-BDO. In one embodiment, if E. coli is to be used as the host organism, glucosephosphate isomerase (pgi) gene can be deleted to divert flux towards the pentose phosphate pathway to increase NADPH pools. Other strategies might involve switching the endogenous NADH-dependent glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) to the host E. coli strain with an exogenous NADPH-dependent glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase derived from Clostridium acetobutylicum. In another method, an NADH kinase (Pos5P) can be introduced from S. cerevisiae into the host E. coli strain. The latter was successfully used to increase several products that are produced through NADPH-dependent pathways [Lee, W.-H., Kim, M.-D., Jin, Y.-S., & Seo, J.-H. (2013). Engineering of NADPH regenerators in Escherichia coli for enhanced biotransformation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 97(7):2761-72].

As will be apparent to persons of skill in the art, if E. coli is chosen as the host organism, NADH pools can be increased by limiting competing pathways though the deletion of genes encoding NADH-dependent enzymes, including but not limited to: alcohol dehydrogenase (adhE), lactate dehydrogenase (ldhA) and pyruvate-formate lyase (pflB) (See FIG. 2).

As will be apparent to persons of skill in the art, bacterial microcompartments (BMC) can be expressed in the host strain in order to increase cofactor pools and pathway metabolite concentrations, or decrease by-product formation from pathway intermediates. In addition, the BMC can reduce the toxic effect of the intermediate aldehydes on the cell and reduce their loss due to their volatile nature [Cai, F., Sutter, M., Bernstein, S. L., Kinney, J. N., & Kerfeld, C. A. (2014). Engineering Bacterial Microcompartment Shells: Chimeric Shell Proteins and Chimeric Carboxysome Shells. ACS Synth Biol. 2015, 4(4):444-53]. Examples of naturally occurring BMC's which have been expressed in E. coli include the propanediol utilization BMC (pdu) and ethanolamine utilization BMC (eut) from Salmonella enterica. The protein shells for these BMCs can be expressed without the internal pathways which would be replaced with the 1,3-1,3-BDO pathway enzymes.

Host microorganisms can be selected from, and the non-naturally occurring microorganisms generated in, for example, bacteria, yeast, fungus or any of a variety of other microorganisms may be used as a host organism.

In some embodiments, bacterial species may include: Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus brevis, Bacillus pumilus, Corynebacterium glutamicum, Zymomonas mobilis, Clostridium acetobutylicum, Clostridium butylicum, Clostridium kluyveri, Clostridium autoethanogenum, Moorella thermoacetica, Clostridium aceticum, Clostridium beijerinckii, Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum, Clostridium perfringens, Clostridium difficile, Clostridium botulinum, Clostridium tyrobutyricum, Clostridium tetanomorphum, Clostridium tetani, Clostridium propionicum, Clostridium aminobutyricum, Clostridium subterminale, Clostridium sticklandii, Ralstonia eutropha, Mycobacterium bovis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Pseudomonas putida, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas carboxidovorans (Oligotropha carboxidovorans), Pseudomonas stutzeri, Klebsiella pneumonia, Klebsiella oxytoca, Anaerobiospirillum succiniciproducens, Actinobacillus succinogenes, Mannheimia succiniciproducens, Rhizobium etli, Gluconobacter oxydans, Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus plantarum, Streptomyces coelicolor, Citrobacter freundii, Citrobacter amalonaticus, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, Acinetobacter baylyi, Thermotoga maritima, Halobacterium salinarum, Serratia marcescens, Rhodospirillum rubrum, Ideonella sp., Rhodobacter capsulatus, Methylococcus capsulatus, Methylosinus trichosporium, Methylobacterium extorquens, Methylocystis GB25, Methylotrophus capsulatus, Methylomonas sp. 16a, Pyrococcus furiosus.

In some embodiments, yeasts or fungi may include: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Saccharomycopsis crataegensis, Kluyveromyces lactis, Kluyveromyces marxianus, Aspergillus terreus, Aspergillus niger, Pichia stipitis, Pichia pastoris, Rhizopus arrhizus, Rhizopus oryzae, Yarrowia lipoiytica, Issatchenkia orientalis, Issatchenkia occidentalis, Candida lambica, Candida sorboxylosa, Candida zemplinina, Candida geochares, Pichia membranifaciens, Zygosaccharomyces kombuchaensis, Candida sorbosivorans, Candida vanderwaltii, Candida sorbophila, Zygosaccharomyces bisporus, Zygosaccharomyces lentus, Saccharomyces bayanus, Saccharomyces bulderi, Debaryomyces castellii, Candida boidinii, Candida etchellsii, Pichia jadinii, Pichia anomala, Penicillium chrysogenum

In some embodiments, cyanobacteria may include: Acaryochloris marina MBIC11017, Anabaena sp. PCC 7120, Anabaena variabilis ATCC 29413, Agmenellum quadruplicatum, Chlorobium tepidum TLS, Cyanothece sp. ATCC 51142, Gloeobacter violaceus PCC 7421, Microcystis aeruginosa NIES-843, Nostoc punctiforme ATCC 29133, Prochlorococcus marinus MED4, Prochlorococcus marinus MIT9313, Prochlorococcus marinus SS120, Prochlorococcus marinus str. AS9601, Prochlorococcus marinus str. MIT 9211, Prochlorococcus marinus str. MIT 9215, Prochlorococcus marinus str. MIT 9301, Prochlorococcus marinus str. MIT 9303, Prochlorococcus marinus str. MIT 9312, Prochlorococcus marinus str. MIT 9515, Prochlorococcus marinus str. NATL1A, Prochlorococcus marinus str. NATL2A, Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGA009, Synechococcus elongatus PCC 6301, Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942, Synechococcus sp. CC9311, Synechococcus sp. CC9605, Synechococcus sp. CC9902, Synechococcus sp. JA-2-3B, Synechococcus sp. JA-3-3Ab, Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002, Synechococcus sp. RCC307, Synechococcussp. WH 7803, Synechococcus sp. WH8102, Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, Thermosynechococcus elongatus BP-1, Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS101.

In some embodiments, algae may include: Botryococcus braunii, Chlamydomonas reinhardii, Chlorella sp., Crypthecodinium cohnii, Cylindrotheca sp., Dunaliella primolecta, Isochrysis sp., Monallanthus salina, Nannochloris sp., Nannochloropsis sp., Neochloris oleoabundans, Nitzschia sp., Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Schizochytrium sp., Tetraselmis sueica.

However, in other embodiments, the host microorganism is not particularly restricted and a person skilled in the art may incorporate the enzymatic activity or activities into any suitable host organism using methods known in the art and/or as described herein.

E. coli and S. cerevisiae are particularly useful host organisms since they are well characterized microorganisms suitable for genetic engineering. Further, acetaldehyde is a natural metabolite of both E. coli and S. cerevisiae present in the central carbon metabolism of both species.

A nucleic acid molecule encoding enzymes as described herein can be used alone or as part of a vector. The nucleic acid molecules can include expression control sequences operably linked to the polynucleotide comprised in the nucleic acid molecule. These expression control sequences may be suited to ensure transcription and synthesis of a translatable RNA in bacteria or fungi. Expression refers to the transcription of the heterologous DNA sequence, preferably into a translatable mRNA. Regulatory elements ensuring expression in fungi and bacteria are known to those skilled in the art and encompass promoters, enhancers, termination signals, targeting signals and the like. Promoters for use in connection with the nucleic acid molecule may be homologous or heterologous with regard to its origin and/or with regard to the gene to be expressed. Suitable promoters are for instance promoters which lend themselves to constitutive expression. However, promoters which are only activated at a point in time determined by external influences can also be used. Artificial and/or chemically inducible promoters may be used. Chemically inducible promoters may include but not limited to: IPTG-inducible promoters such as T7 or Ptrc, or tetracycline-inducible promoters such as PLtetO-1 of which sequences are known to one skilled in the art.

An overview of different expression systems is for instance contained in Bitter et al. (Methods in Enzymology 153 (1987), 516-544) and in Sawers et al. (Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 46 (1996), 1-9), Billman-Jacobe (Current Opinion in Biotechnology 7 (1996), 500-4), Hockney (Trends in Biotechnology 12 (1994), 456-463), Griffiths et al., (Methods in Molecular Biology 75 (1997), 427-440). An overview of yeast expression systems is for instance given by Hensing et al. (Antonie van Leuwenhoek 67 (1995), 261-279), Bussineau et al. (Developments in Biological Standardization 83 (1994), 13-19), Gellissen et al. (Antonie van Leuwenhoek 62 (1992), 79-93, Fleer (Current Opinion in Biotechnology 3 (1992), 486-496), Vedvick (Current Opinion in Biotechnology 2 (1991), 742-745) and Buckholz (Bio/Technology 9 (1991), 1067-1072).

Expression vectors have been widely described in the literature. As a rule, they contain not only a selection marker gene and a replication-origin ensuring replication in the host selected, but also a bacterial or viral promoter, and in most cases a termination signal for transcription. Between the promoter and the termination signal there is in general at least one restriction site or a polylinker which enables the insertion of a coding DNA sequence. The DNA sequence naturally controlling the transcription of the corresponding gene can be used as the promoter sequence, if it is active in the selected host organism. However, this sequence can also be exchanged for other promoter sequences. It is possible to use promoters ensuring constitutive expression of the gene and inducible promoters which permit a deliberate control of the expression of the gene. Bacterial and viral promoter sequences possessing these properties are described in detail in the literature. Regulatory sequences for the expression in microorganisms, including E. coli and S. cerevisiae, are described in the literature known to those of skill in the art. Promoters permitting a particularly high expression of a downstream sequence are for instance the T7 promoter [Studier et al., Methods in Enzymology 185 (1990), 60-89], lacUV5, trp, trp-lacUV5 [DeBoer et al., in Rodriguez and Chamberlin (Eds), Promoters, Structure and Function; Praeger, New York, (1982), 462-481; DeBoer et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1983), 21-25], Ip1, rac [Boros et al., Gene 42 (1986), 97-100]. Termination signals for transcription are also described in the literature.

Inducible promoters which may provide higher polypeptide yields than constitutive promoters can be used. Suitably, in certain embodiments, a two-stage process may be used: the host cells are first cultured under optimum conditions up to a relatively high cell density; and transcription is then induced.

As will be understood by those of skill in the art, when two or more exogenous encoding nucleic acids are to be co-expressed, both nucleic acids may be inserted, for example, into one expression vector or into separate expression vectors. For single vector expression, the encoding nucleic acids can be operationally linked to a common expression control sequence or linked to different expression control sequences, such as one inducible promoter and one constitutive promoter.

It is to be understood that in one embodiment, a non-naturally occurring microorganism that produces a pathway intermediate or product, may be used in combination with another organism (or other organisms) expressing downstream or upstream pathway enzyme(s) to produce a desired product. For example, a wild-type or engineered organism can be used to produce and accumulate pyruvate, acetaldehyde, and/or 3-hydroxybutyralehdye. These intermediates can then be used as a substrate for another engineered organism expressing one or more of the 1,3-BDO pathway genes to convert to 1,3-BDO.

In other embodiments, a microorganism as provided herein can optionally be engineered to delete one or more byproduct or alternative pathways. Such exemplary pathways are shown with an X in FIG. 2. In one, embodiment, one or more genes encoding an alcohol dehydrogenase, a lactate dehydrogenase or a pyruvate formate lyase are deleted from a host microorganism. In one embodiment, the host microorganism is E. coli and one or all of the genes adhE, IdhA and pflB are deleted. Other genes native to E. coli and homologous to one or more of adhE, ldhA, and pflB can also be deleted. For example, one skilled in the art can identify, through multiple sequence alignment algorithms (such as ClustalW), aldehyde reductases and alcohol dehydrogenase that share similar function to adhE which catalyzes the reduction of acetaldehyde to ethanol. Aldehyde reductases or alcohol dehdyrogenases that are native to E. coli that show activity on acetaldehyde include but not limited to sequence data found in the TABLE 4 below.

TABLE 4 Gene name GenBank Accession GI Organism yahK P75691.1 2492774 Escherichia coli yqhD Q46856.1 3025295 Escherichia coli yjgB AAA97166.1 537111 Escherichia coli gldA BAE77365.1 85676115 Escherichia coli ybbO BAE76272.1 85674632 Escherichia coli yghA BAE77062.1 85675809 Escherichia coli adhP BAA15126.1 1742410 Escherichia coli fucO BAE76871.1 85675618 Escherichia coli eutG BAA16331.1 1799879 Escherichia coli yiaY YP_026233.1 49176377 Escherichia coli eutE NP_416950.1 16130380 Escherichia coli betA NP_414845.1 16128296 Escherichia coli

However, one skilled in the art can also determine the activity of the aldehyde reductases and alcohol dehydrogenases described above on 3-hydroxybutyraldehyde, which is an intermediate in the 1,3-BDO pathway. In one embodiment, one or more of the aldehyde reductases and alcohol dehdyrogenases described herein that show substrate preference and activity towards 3-hydroxybutyraldehyde may be overexpressed in the host organism to improve 1,3-BDO production. One skilled in the art can also perform sequence similarity search to identify homologues derived from other organisms to the native aldehyde reductases and alcohol dehydrogenases in E. coli that show activity on 3-hydroxybutyraldehyde.

In some embodiments, the 1,3-BDO pathway may also produce side products, which may include acetate, ethanol, and acetoin. In certain embodiments, pathways for converting these side products into the acetaldehyde precursor are overexpressed. The following (TABLE 5) are pathways that can convert side-products, acetate, ethanol, and acetoin into acetaldehyde.

TABLE 5 KEGG REACTION ID ENZYME NAME EC NUMBER REACTION R00228 acetaldehyde:NAD+ 1.2.1.10 Acetaldehyde + CoA + NAD+ <=> oxidoreductase (CoA- Acetyl-CoA + NADH + H+ acetylating) R00326 acetaldehyde:acceptor 1.2.99.6 Acetaldehyde + Acceptor + oxidoreductase H2O <=> Acetate + Reduced acceptor R00710 Acetaldehyde:NAD+ 1.2.1.3, Acetaldehyde + NAD+ + oxidoreductase 1.2.1.5 H2O <=> Acetate + NADH + H+ R00711 Acetaldehyde:NADP+ 1.2.1.4, 1.2.1.5, Acetaldehyde + NADP+ + oxidoreductase; 1.2.1.- H2O <=> Acetate + NADPH + H+ R00746 Ethanol:NADP+ 1.1.1.2, 1.1.1.71 Ethanol + NADP+ <=> oxidoreductase; Acetaldehyde + NADPH + H+ R01019 acetaldehyde:pyrrolo- 1.2.99.3 PQQ + Acetaldehyde + H2O <=> quinoline-quinone PQQH2 + Acetate oxidoreductase R02345 3-Hydroxybutan-2-one:D- 2.2.1.4 Acetoin + D-Ribose 5-phosphate <=> ribose-5-phosphate Acetaldehyde + 1-Deoxy-D- aldehydetransferase altro-heptulose 7-phosphate R05198 ethanol:cytochrome c 1.1.2.8 Ethanol + 2 Ferricytochrome c <=> oxidoreductase 2 Ferrocytochrome c + Acetaldehyde + 2 H+ R09127 ethanol:cytochrome c 1.1.2.7 Ethanol + 2 Ferricytochrome oxidoreductase cL <=> Acetaldehyde + 2 Ferrocytochrome cL + 2 H+ R09479 ethanol:quinone 1.1.5.5 Ethanol + Ubiquinone <=> oxidoreductase Acetaldehyde + Ubiquinol R09524 acetyl-CoA:acetoin O- 2.3.1.190 Acetoin + CoA + NAD+ <=> acetyltransferase Acetaldehyde + Acetyl-CoA + NADH + H+ R09552 ethanol:N,N-dimethyl-4- 1.1.99.36 Ethanol + N,N-Dimethyl-4- nitrosoaniline nitrosoaniline <=> Acetaldehyde + oxidoreductase 4-(Hydroxylamino)-N,N- dimethylaniline *The reaction IDs refer to Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) as of 13^(th) May 2015.

In one embodiment, pyruvate used in according to embodiments of the present invention is produced from renewable feedstock (such as glucose). In one embodiment, the host organism is provided with a feedstock of sugars. Such sources include, for example, sugars such as glucose, xylose, arabinose, galactose, mannose, fructose, starch, and combinations thereof. Glucose can be obtained from various carbohydrate-containing sources including conventional biorenewable sources such as corn (maize), wheat, potato, cassava and rice as well as alternative sources such as energy crops, plant biomass, agricultural wastes, forestry residues, sugar processing residues and plant-derived household wastes.

Sources of carbohydrate include renewable feedstocks and biomass, e.g. cellulosic biomass, hemicellulosic biomass and lignin feedstocks. Other renewable feedstocks and biomass will be known to persons of skill in the art.

Biorenewable feedstock sources that may be used in accordance with the present invention include any renewable organic matter that includes a source of carbohydrates. These include, for example, grasses, trees (hardwood and softwood), vegetation and crop residues. Other sources can include, for example, waste materials (e.g., spent paper, green waste, municipal waste, etc.). Suitable carbohydrates, including glucose, may be isolated from biorenewable materials using methods that are known in the art. See, for example, Centi and van Santen, Catalysis for Renewables, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 2007; Kamm, Gruber and Kamm, Biorefineries-Industrial Processes and Products, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 2006; Shang-Tian Yang, Bioprocessing for Value-Added Products from Renewable Resources New Technologies and Applications, Elsevier B. V. 2007; Furia, Starch in the Food Industry, Chapter 8, CRC Handbook of Food Additives 2nd Edition CRC Press, 1973. See also chapters devoted to Starch, Sugar and Syrups within Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology 5th Edition, John Wiley and Sons 2001. Processes to convert starch to glucose are also well known in the art, see, for example, Schenck, “Glucose and Glucose containing Syrups” in Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Wiley-VCH 2009. Furthermore, methods to convert cellulose to glucose are known in the art, see, for example, Centi and van Santen, Catalysis for Renewables, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 2007; Kamm, Gruber and Kamm, Biorefineries-Industrial Processes and Products, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 2006; Shang-Tian Yang, Bioprocessing for Value-Added Products from Renewable Resources New Technologies and Applications, Elsevier B. V. 2007.

Alternative carbon sources may be crude glycerol obtained from biodiesel production plants, lactic acid obtained from degradation of waste poly-lactic acid, lactose or cheese whey permeate obtained from dairy industry, glucosamine obtained from chitin rich waste. The carbon sources may also be fatty acids and their esters (monoglycerides, diglycerides and triglycerides) obtained from plants or plant products such as canola oil, coconut oil, corn oil, olive oil, palm oil, safflower oil, peanut oil, soybean oil, sesame oil, sunflower oil and combinations thereof.

Another carbon source may be synthesis gas or “syngas”, which is primarily a mixture of H2 and CO may contain CO2 and which is a product of the gasification of organic or fossil fuel based carbonaceous materials.

C1 compounds, such as carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), and methane (CH4) can be derived as feedstocks from wastes gases from industry such as steel manufacture, oil refining, coal, and natural gas, shale gas, biogas, and methane hydrates, as well as in the form of synthesis gas (or syngas) produced from gasification of sustainable resources such as biomass and domestic waste and agricultural wastes.

Additional sustainable carbon sources can be achieved by using electrochemical reduction of CO2 to formic acid or oxalic acid, and using these compounds as carbon sources in fermentation.

Currently six different pathways are known for carbon fixation: reductive pentose phosphate pathway (Calvin) cycle, reductive acetyl-CoA (Wood-Ljungdahl) pathway, reductive citric acid cycle, 3-hydroxypropionate bicycle, dicarboxylate/4-hydroxybutyrate cycle, and 3-hydroxypropionate/4-hydroxybutyrate cycle [Fuchs G, 2011 Alternative pathways of carbon dioxide fixation: insights into the early evolution of life? Annual Reviews in Microbiology, 65:631-658]. In addition to these pathways, synthetic carbon-fixation pathways can be used which fall within the family of malonyl-CoA-oxaloacetate-glyoxylate (MOG) family of pathways [Bar-Even et al., Design and Analysis of synthetic carbon fixation pathways. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences USA, 2010, 107:8889-8894].

In one embodiment, the processes as provided may be carried out in a fermenter.

The engineered organism can be cultivated in a variety of reactor systems, and the process can be carried out in different modes of operations. The most commonly used bioreactor is a stirred tank bioreactor or aerated fermenter. The fermenter is equipped with sterile air supply, the mixing of bubble dispersion is achieved by mechanical agitation, and the temperature may be maintained using a jacket or coil that circulates steam or cooling water. For aerated vessels, high height/diameter ratio (>3) may be chosen to increase the contact time between the bubbles and liquid phase. Other variations of bioreactors are airlift bioreactor where mixing is achieved without mechanical agitation, and packed bed or fluidized bed bioreactors which are used when the biocatalyst is immobilized.

The fermentation can be carried out in three different modes: batch, fed-batch and continuous mode. A standard batch bioreactor is considered a “closed” system. In batch mode, all the media components are added to bioreactor while ensuring the sterility. Once the medium has been prepared, the bioreactor is inoculated with an appropriate inoculum and the fermentation is allowed to proceed until the end without any changes to the medium, i.e., without feeding of any additional components. Components such as acid and/or base can, however, be added to maintain the pH, and air/oxygen can be added to maintain the dissolved oxygen levels. In batch fermentation biomass and product concentration change over time until the fermentation is complete. The cells undergo classical lag-phase, exponential growth-phase, stationary phase growth, followed by death phase.

A variation of the batch mode is fed-batch mode where the nutrients including the carbon source is added to the fermenter as the process progresses.

In addition to batch or fed-batch mode, continuous mode of fermentation can also be used. A continuous system is considered to be “open” system in contrast to the batch mode. In continuous mode, defined production medium is added continuously to the bioreactor and equal amount of bioreactor contents are removed at the same rate. Continuous operation can be carried out in a chemostat where the vessel contents, including the cells are removed, or in a bioreactor that uses perfusion culture, which allows recycling of the viable cells back to the bioreactor, allowing high cell densities to be achieved.

The commonly used fermenter designs and different operation modes are very well-established in the literature [Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals, 2nd Ed. J. E. Bailey and D. F. Ollis, McGraw Hill, New York, 1986; Development of Sustainable Bioprocesses: Modeling and Assessment, E. Heinzle, A. P. Biwer and C. L. Cooney, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2006; Bioprocess Engineering: Basic Concepts, 2nd Ed., M. L. Shuler and F. Kargi, Prentice Hall, 2001].

Batch, fed-batch or continuous fermentation procedures may be employed.

In one embodiment, processes as provided herein are carried out in substantially anaerobic conditions. “Substantially anaerobic” when used in reference to a culture or growth condition means, in one embodiment, that the amount of oxygen is less than about 10% of saturation for dissolved oxygen in liquid media. In one embodiment, the term includes sealed chambers of liquid or solid medium maintained with an atmosphere less than about 1% oxygen. In another embodiment, the processes are conducted under substantially aerobic conditions. As used herein the term “substantially aerobic” when used in reference to a culture or growth condition means, in one embodiment, that the amount of oxygen is equal to or greater than about 10% of saturation for dissolved oxygen in liquid media. In one embodiment, the term includes sealed chambers of liquid or solid medium maintained with an atmosphere greater than about 1% oxygen. Methods of maintaining aerobic or anaerobic conditions within a bioreactor are known to those of skill in the art.

As will be understood by a person of skill in the art, various components may be added to the culture medium to support growth of the microorganism and/or the metabolic processes described herein, including, for example, nutrients, pH modifiers, osmoprotectants.

The organisms can be grown in any suitable medium for growth such as Luria-Bertani broth, Terrific broth or yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) medium. For production, depending up on the choice of the host, synthetic minimal media such as M9 minimal medium, yeast synthetic minimal medium, yeast nitrogen base, BG-11, or variations thereof can be used. A suitable minimal medium must contain at least one carbon source, at least one nitrogen source, salts, cofactors, buffers, and other components required to grow and maintain the recombinant microorganism. The carbon source can be one or more of the carbon sources described previously, the nitrogen source can be an ammonium salt or nitrate salt including but not limited to (NH4)2SO4, NH4Cl, (NH4)2HPO4, NH4OH, KNO3, NaNO3. The medium may be supplemented with complex or organic nitrogen sources such as urea, yeast extract, casamino acids, peptone, tryptone, soy flour, corn steep liquor, or casein hydrolysate. Additionally, the minimal medium can be supplied with trace metals including but not limited to H3BO3, MnCl2, ZnSO4, Na2MoO4, CuSO4, Co(NO3)2, CuCl2, ZnCl2, CoCl2, FeCl3, KI. The minimal medium may be supplemented with vitamins and/or non-vitamin compounds including but not limited to biotin, pantothanate, folic acid, inositol, nicotinic acid, p-aminobenzoic acid, pyridoxine, riboflavin, thiamine, cyanocobalamin, citric acid, ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), ferric ammonium citrate. The medium can be supplied by carbon dioxide either by direct sparging or in the form of NaHCO3, or Na2CO3.

Depending upon the host organism used the minimal medium may suitably have a pH range between pH 2.0-pH 10.0.

The fermentation may be carried out in temperature ranging from 25° C. to 42° C. Higher temperature may be used if the host organism chosen is thermophilic where the cultivation temperature could be as high as 80° C.

The fermentation may be carried out under aerobic, microaerobic, or anaerobic conditions. It could also be carried out under two different phases involving aerobic growth-phase and a microaerobic or anaerobic production phase. Sterile air or oxygen may be introduced to maintain the desired dissolved oxygen levels in the medium.

The amount of product in the medium can be determined using methods known in the art such as High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC), Gas Chromatography (GC), Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS), Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS).

Methods of assaying for the production of 1,3-butanediol are known to those of skill in the art and further are exemplified in Example 3. For example, product, intermediate and byproduct formation can be analyzed by methods such as HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography) equipped with a refractive index and/or photodiode array detector(s), GC-MS (Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy), GC-FID (Gas Chromatography-Flame Ionization Detector) and LC-MS (Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy). Individual enzymatic activities from the exogenous DNA sequences can also be assayed using methods well known in the art.

In some embodiments, processes as disclosed herein further include purifying the product of the processes, for e.g. 1,3-BDO. Such methods of purification are known to those of skill in the art and include e.g. by liquid extraction, filtration, distillation or evaporation. Isolation of compound from the fermentation broth depends on the final purity of the compound required. The separation techniques may include: centrifugation, microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nano-filtration, evaporation, crystallization, distillation, and ion-exchange. Typical downstream processing operation would include a series of processes including separation of cells using centrifugation or microfiltration, removal of additional solids in the broth using ultrafiltration, removal of salts from the broth using nanofiltration, ion-exchange, or evaporative crystallization, and finally purification of 1,3-BDO using distillation.

As will be understood by persons of skill in the art, in one embodiment, microorganisms as described herein may be produced to secrete the resulting product, whether by choosing a host organism with a secretory signal corresponding to the product or by engineering the host organism to provide for the same. For example, membrane-bound transporter proteins can be overexpressed in the host organism to improve the secretion of 1,3-BDO to the fermentation broth, including but not limited to yhjX gene encoding a pyruvate-inducible inner membrane protein and putative transporter which belongs to the major facilitator superfamily of proteins, and the product can be recovered from the culture medium. In other embodiments, the product may be extracted from the microorganism. In one method, the microorganisms may be ruptured and the culture medium or lysate may be centrifuged to remove particulate cell debris, and the membrane and soluble protein fractions may be separated if necessary.

It will be understood that numerous modifications thereto will appear to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the above description and accompanying drawings should be taken as illustrative of the invention and not in a limiting sense. It will further be understood that it is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention following, in general, the principles of the invention and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice within the art to which the invention pertains and as may be applied to the essential features herein before set forth, and as follows in the scope of the appended claims.

All documents referenced herein are incorporated by reference, however, it should be appreciated that any patent, publication, or other disclosure material, in whole or in part, that is incorporated by reference herein is incorporated only to the extent that the incorporated material does not conflict with definitions, statements, or other disclosure material set forth in this disclosure. As such, and to the extent necessary, the disclosure as explicitly set forth herein supersedes any conflicting material incorporated herein by reference.

The embodiments of the invention described above are intended to be exemplary only. The scope of the invention is therefore intended to be limited solely by the scope of the appended claims.

EXAMPLES

The present invention is further described in the following examples. The examples provided are only illustrative of the invention and not in a limiting sense.

The strains and plasmids constructed and used in the examples provided in the document are listed in the following TABLE 6:

TABLE 6 Genotype Strain designation Wild type E. coli MG 1655 LMSE-25 E. coli MG1655 ΔadhE, ΔldhA, ΔpflB LMSE-21 LMSE-25 with pTrc99A ecBD-5 LMSE-25 with pBD3 ecBD-6 Wild type with pBD3 Plasmids Empty vector pTrc99A pBD3 pTrc99A + BH1352 + PA1127 + PDC

Example 1: Selection of DERA Enzyme for 1,3-Butanediol Pathway

This example describes screening, selection and characterization of enzyme candidates for 1,3-BDO pathway.

The first step in the 1,3-BDO biosynthetic pathway is the condensation of two acetaldehyde molecules by deoxyribose-5-phosphate aldolase to generate 3-hydroxybutanal (3HB). To identify the aldolase that could condense the two acetaldehyde molecules, a list of 72 class I aldolase homologues or putative aldolases was identified based on sequence similarity to E. coli deoxyribose-5-phosphate aldolase (DERA). These 72 putative aldolases are listed in TABLE 7.

TABLE 7 Target Genome Gene ORF GI PDB Status AA0111 Aquifex aeolicus deoC 15605723 1MZH Identity 100% AA1079 Aquifex aeolicus na 15606691 2QJI Identity 58% AF0108 Archaeoglobus fulgidus AF0108 2650540 2QJI Identity 63% AF0230 Archaeoglobus fulgidus AF0230 2650411 2QJI Identity 47% APE0011 Aeropyrum pernix APE0011 5103399 1OK6 Identity 40% APE2437 Aeropyrum pernix APE2437 5106141 1N7K Identity 100% ATC0125 Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 deoC 17934050 1P1X Identity 54% ATC0125 Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 deoC 17934050 1P1X Identity 53% AU05279 Aspergillus fumigatus na 71000527 3OA3 Identity 38% AU12363 Aspergillus fumigatus na 70986744 3NGJ Identity 27% BAS1754 Bacillus anthracis str. Sterne na 49184766 3NGJ Identity 58% BAS2771 Bacillus anthracis str. Sterne na 49185777 3GND Identity 42% BCE1975 Bacillus cereus ATCC 10987 dra 42781044 3NGJ Identity 58% BCE3019 Bacillus cereus ATCC 10987 na 42782075 3GKF Identity 42% BH1352 Bacillus halodurans dra 15613915 3NGJ Identity 61% BSU3938 Bacillus subtilis 225185466 3NGJ Identity 58% CT215 Chlamydia trachomatis dhnA 15604935 1OK6 Identity 24% CV3701 Chromobacterium violaceum deoC 34499156 1P1X Identity 68% DHC1073 Dehalococcoides CBDB1 na 73749029 3KAO Identity 29% DRD1181 Deinococcus radiodurans DR1205 6458945 3R13 Identity 54% EC1535 Escherichia coli K12 deoC 16132198 1P1X Identity 100% EC1726 Escherichia coli K12 yneB 16129476 3GKF Identity 100% EC1734 Escherichia coli K12 yihT 16131721 1TO3 Identity 87% EC2144 Escherichia coli K12 b2097 90111385 1OK6 Identity 20% HL0239 Halobacterium sp na 15789585 2QJI Identity 43% HL0521 Halobacterium sp na 15789872 1OK6 Identity 46% HL1382 Halobacterium sp deoC 15790758 3R13 Identity 43% LB1413 Lactobacillus brevis na na 3NGJ Identity 49% LMO0539 Listeria monocytogenes na 16802582 3KAO Identity 52% LMO1995 Listeria monocytogenes dra 16804034 3NGJ Identity 61% LPG1433 Legionella pneumophila Philadelphia 1 deoC 52841663 1KTN Identity 32% MG050 Mycoplasma genitalium MG050 1045723 3NGJ Identity 40% MJ0404 Methanococcus jannaschii na 15668576 2QJI Identity 100% MJ1609 Methanococcus jannaschii na 15669781 4MOZ Identity 53% MTH0579 Methanothermobacter MTH0579 2621657 2QJI Identity 62% thermautotrophicus MTH0818 Methanothermobacter MTH0818 2621909 3R13 Identity 55% thermautotrophicus PH0082 Pyrococcus horikoshii PH0082 3256468 2QJI Identity 34% PS0950 Pseudomonas syringae tomato DC3000 deoC 28868193 1P1X Identity 38% PSPH0865 Pseudomonas syringae phaseolicola deoC 71733380 1P1X Identity 37% 1448A RHA06207 Rhodococcus sp. RHA1 na 111018361 3FOK Identity 57% RHA07557 Rhodococcus sp. RHA1 na 111019087 3NDO Identity 60% SA0138 Staphylococcus aureus dra 15923128 3NGJ Identity 53% SA2137 Staphylococcus aureus na 15925127 3NGJ Identity 52% SA2192 Staphylococcus aureus lacD 15925182 3KAO Identity 100% SAV3348 Streptomyces avermitilis deoC 29829888 1KTN Identity 33% SAV5342 Streptomyces avermitilis na 29831882 3FOK Identity 46% SAV7151 Streptomyces avermitilis na 29833691 3FOK Identity 51% SC4702 Streptomyces coelicolor na 21223288 1KTN Identity 33% SC6677 Streptomyces coelicolor na 21225263 3FOK Identity 50% SF1578 Shigella flexneri 2a na 24112949 3GKF Identity 98% SF2159 Shigella flexneri 2a na 24113475 1OK6 Identity 22% SF3953 Shigella flexneri 2a yihT 24115171 1TO3 Identity 86% SF4413 Shigella flexneri 2a deoC 56480609 1P1X Identity 99% SM2560 Sinorhizobium meliloti na 15966313 3NGJ Identity 31% SM5179 Sinorhizobium meliloti na 16264228 2QJI Identity 30% SM5503 Sinorhizobium meliloti deoC 16264552 1ktnB00 Identity 31% SO1217 Shewanella oneidensis deoC 24372798 1P1X Identity 63% SP0843 Streptococcus pneumoniae TIGR4 na 15900730 3NGJ Identity 59% SP1190 Streptococcus pneumoniae TIGR4 na 15901055 3KAO Identity 75% SPA0711 Salmonella enterica Paratypi ATCC9150 fbaB 56412946 1OK6 Identity 16% SPA3863 Salmonella enterica Paratypi ATCC9150 yihT 56415868 1TO3 Identity 99% SPA3921 Salmonella enterica Paratypi ATCC9150 yneB 56415923 3GKF Identity 89% SPA4381 Salmonella enterica Paratypi ATCC9150 deoC 56416341 1P1X Identity 94% SSO3226 Sulfolobus solfataricus SSO3226 13816668 2QJI Identity 34% STU0806 Streptococcus thermophilus LMG18311 na 55820857 3R13 Identity 56% TA0684 Thermoplasma acidophilum TA0684 10639970 1VCV Identity 37% TM1559 Thermotoga maritima TM1559 4982126 3R13 Identity 100% TSTM2012 Salmonella typhimurium LT2 fbaB 16765470 1OK6 Identity 16% TSTM3768 Salmonella typhimurium LT2 yihT 16767287 1TO3 Identity 99% TSTM3821 Salmonella typhimurium LT2 yneB 16767344 3GKF Identity 89% TSTM4263 Salmonella typhimurium LT2 deoC 16767808 1P1X Identity 94% TTC0823 Thermus thermophilus HB27 na 46199129 1UB3 Identity 98%

Furthermore, three residues in the active site of E. coli have been shown to play a crucial role in forming a Schiff-based intermediate with the donor aldehyde that is critical for the aldol condensation to occur. These residues are: Lys167, Lys201, and Asp102 (the number refers to the residue number in E. coli DERA). A multiple sequence alignment was performed using MAFFT to find 34 of the 72 enzymes that had the aforementioned residues strictly conserved. The list of these 34 selected enzymes is shown in TABLE 8.

TABLE 8 Target Genome Gene ORF GI PDB Status AA0111 Aquifex aeolicus deoC 15605723 1MZH Identity 100% APE2437 Aeropyrum pernix APE2437 5106141 1N7K Identity 100% ATC0125 Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 deoC 17934050 1P1X Identity 54% AU05279 Aspergillus fumigatus na 71000527 3OA3 Identity 38% AU12363 Aspergillus fumigatus na 70986744 3NGJ Identity 27% BAS1754 Bacillus anthracis str. Sterne na 49184766 3NGJ Identity 58% BCE1975 Bacillus cereus ATCC 10987 dra 42781044 3NGJ Identity 58% BH1352 Bacillus halodurans dra 15613915 3NGJ Identity 61% BSU3938 Bacillus subtilis 225185466 3NGJ Identity 58% CV3701 Chromobacterium violaceum deoC 34499156 1P1X Identity 68% DRD1181 Deinococcus radiodurans DR1205 6458945 3R13 Identity 54% HL1382 Halobacterium sp deoC 15790758 3R13 Identity 43% LB1413 Lactobacillus brevis na na 3NGJ Identity 49% LMO1995 Listeria monocytogenes dra 16804034 3NGJ Identity 61% LPG1433 Legionella pneumophila Philadelphia 1 deoC 52841663 1KTN Identity 32% MG050 Mycoplasma genitalium MG050 1045723 3NGJ Identity 40% MTH0818 Methanothermobacter MTH0818 2621909 3R13 Identity 55% thermautotrophicus PS0950 Pseudomonas syringae tomato deoC 28868193 1P1X Identity 38% DC3000 PSPH0865 Pseudomonas syringae phaseolicola deoC 71733380 1P1X Identity 37% 1448A RHA07557 Rhodococcus sp. RHA1 na 111019087 3NDO Identity 60% SA0138 Staphylococcus aureus dra 15923128 3NGJ Identity 53% SA2137 Staphylococcus aureus na 15925127 3NGJ Identity 52% SAV3348 Streptomyces avermitilis deoC 29829888 1KTN Identity 33% SC4702 Streptomyces coelicolor na 21223288 1 KTN Identity 33% SF4413 Shigella flexneri 2a deoC 56480609 1P1X Identity 99% SM2560 Sinorhizobium meliloti na 15966313 3NGJ Identity 31% SM5503 Sinorhizobium meliloti deoC 16264552 1KTN Identity 31% SO1217 Shewanella oneidensis deoC 24372798 1P1X Identity 63% SP0843 Streptococcus pneumoniae TIGR4 na 15900730 3NGJ Identity 59% SPA4381 Salmonella entericaParatypi ATCC9150 deoC 56416341 1P1X Identity 94% TA0684 Thermoplasma acidophilum TA0684 10639970 1VCV Identity 37% TM1559 Thermotoga maritima TM1559 4982126 3R13 Identity 100% TSTM4263 Salmonella typhimurium LT2 deoC 16767808 1P1X Identity 94% TTC0823 Thermus thermophilus HB27 na 46199129 1UB3 Identity 98%

To further narrow down the list of potential aldolase enzymes from the 34 enzymes, aldolase from T. maritima (TM1559) that was previously shown to exhibit higher aldol condensation activity towards acetaldehyde relative to E. coli DERA was chosen. TM1559 thus represented a potentially better DERA than E. coli's. As such, TM1559 was used as a basis to screen for the potential DERAs that had not been previously characterized but that could exhibit higher acetaldehyde aldol condensation activity.

Our further analysis of the crystal structure of DERA from T. maritima [Heine, A., Luz, J. G., Wong, C.-H. & Wilson, I. a Analysis of the class I aldolase binding site architecture based on the crystal structure of 2-deoxyribose-5-phosphate aldolase at 0.99A resolution. Journal of molecular biology 343, 1019-34 (2004)] and multiple sequence alignment analysis, revealed interesting residues in the phosphate binding pocket of TM1559 that could have a role to play in aldol condensation activity towards acetaldehyde. These residues were conserved in a few of the DERA enzymes from the 34 remaining enzymes but not in E. coli DERA. These residues were: N21K, Y49N, A71C or V, K172F, N176H or G (where the first letter and number refer to the residue and its location in EC1535, and the final letter refers to the corresponding residue in TM1559). Based on these residues, the list was narrowed further to 15 enzymes with potential for higher acetaldehyde aldol condensation activity (TM1559 and EC1535 were also included in the list for comparison). A multiple sequence alignment of the fifteen DERAs chosen for further analysis is shown in FIG. 4 and listed in TABLE 9.

TABLE 9 Internal Ex- Stock refer- pressed concen- ence and tration ID Organism GI Purified [mg/mL] APE2437 Aeropyrum pernix 5106141 No n.a. BCE1975 Bacillus cereus 42781044 Yes 4.03 ATCC 10987 BH1352 Bacillus halodurans 15613915 Yes 3.53 BSU3938 Bacillus subtilis 225185466 Yes 1.92 DRD1181 Deinococcus radiodurans 6458945 Yes 5.15 EC1535 Escherichia coli K12 16132198 Yes 4.1  HL1382 Halobacterium sp. 15790758 No n.a. LB1413 Lactobacillus brevis na No n.a. LMO1995 Listeria monocytogenes 16804034 Yes 3.06 MTH0818 Methanothermobacter 2621909 Yes 3.22 thermautotrophicus SA0138 Staphylococcus aureus 15923128 No n.a. SA2137 Staphylococcus aureus 15925127 Yes 1.97 SP0843 Streptococcus 15900730 Yes 3.53 pneumoniae TIGR4 TA0684 Thermoplasma 10639970 No n.a. acidophilum TM1559 Thermotoga maritima 4982126 Yes 10.38 

Example 2. Characterization of DERA Enzymes for Acetaldehyde Aldol Condensation by In Vitro Assay

DERA from fifteen species, the thirteen candidates along with DERAs from T. maritima and E. coli, were each expressed in a host organism, and ten were successfully purified (TABLE 9).

The ten purified DERA enzymes were screened for their activity against acetaldehyde aldol condensation using an enzymatic assay as previously described [Chen, L., Dumas, D. P. & Wong, C. Deoxyribose-5-phosphate Aldolase as a Catalyst in Asymmetric Aldol Condensation. Journal of the American Chemical Society 114, 741-748 (1992)]. Briefly, each enzyme was allowed to react with acetaldehyde for five hours. A 20 μL aliquot from each reaction was taken and placed on ice. Then 2.5 μL of the sample was diluted 20 times in water. To assay the amount of acetaldehyde remaining in the reaction, 6 μL of the diluted sample was added to a mixture containing 0.3 mM NADH, 1 mg of yeast alcohol dehydrogenase, in 100 mM triethanolamine buffer (TEA) at pH 7.5 in 96-well plates such that each well contained a final volume of 200 μL. The absorbance of NADH (∈340 nm=6220 M−1·cm−1) was monitored at 340 nm using a plate reader where the decrease in absorbance due to NADH consumption was directly proportional to the amount of acetaldehyde remaining in each reaction. As such, the amount of acetaldehyde consumed in each reaction was the difference between the initial amount of acetaldehyde used in each aldol reaction and the amount of NADH consumed in the enzyme assay. The specific activity was determined from the amount of acetaldehyde consumed over 5 hours in a reaction mixture containing 0.8 mg of each enzyme.

The results of the assay are shown in FIG. 8. All 10 enzymes exhibited some activity towards acetaldehyde aldol condensation. DERA from T. maritima appears to exhibit the highest activity followed by DERA from six organisms that exhibit higher activity than E. coli DERA. These six organisms share strictly conserved residues to TM1559: N21K, Y49N, K172F, N176G, except have A71C instead of A71V (where the first letter and number refer to the residue and its location in EC1535, and the final letter refers to the corresponding residue in TM1559).

Example 3: Identification of the Product from Acetaldehyde Condensation Using DERA

In order to identify the product formed from the aldol condensation of acetaldehyde by DERA tested in Example 2, the enzymatic reaction mixture was prepared again in a larger volume and analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

Briefly, a 6 mL reaction mixture was prepared by adding 20 mM of acetaldehyde and 600 mg of B. halodurans DERA in 100 mM triethanolamine buffer at pH 7.5. In parallel, a negative control was prepared similarly to the reaction but acetaldehyde was omitted. The two mixtures were incubated at room temperature. A 500 μL sample was taken from each, every five minutes for one hour. An aliquot of 200 μL of concentrated sulfuric acid was added to each sample to quench the reaction and placed on ice. The samples were then analyzed by IPLC on a Dionex Ultimate 3000 system equipped with a refractive index detector. An HPX-87H column was used to separate the analytes, acetaldehyde and 3113 with the following method: 30° C., 5 mM H2SO4, 0.8 mL/min, 20 min runtime. The peaks were identified using an RI-detector. The standard of 3-113 eluted at 11.8 min, and acetaldehyde standard at 13.5 min. The enzymes tested using IPLC included those from B. halodurans (BH1352), and E. coli (EC1535) (results not shown). The reactions using either enzyme resulted in acetaldehyde consumption and synthesis of 3113. The cocentrations of acetaldehyde and 3113 are summarized in TABLE 10 below:

TABLE 10 acetaldehyde concentration 3HB concentration Time = Time = Time = Time = 0 min 60 mins 0 mins 60 mins Control 20.07 mM 19.64 mM 0 0 Sample 20.56 mM 16.83 mM 0.05 mM 2.12 mM

Example 4: Selection of Aldo-Ketoreductase Enzyme for 1,3-Butanediol Pathways

The second step in the biosynthetic pathway to produce 1,3-butanediol (1,3-BDO) taught herein involves reducing 3HB to 1,3-BDO using an aldo-ketoreductase. Screening of the enzymes required for this reaction was carried out by screening 37 putative candidate aldo-keto reductases (TABLE 11). Substrate specificity on acetaldehyde and 3HB under relaxed conditions was measured spectrophotometrically in 96-well plates at 37° C. for 30 min in a reaction mixture containing K2HPO4 (50 mM, pH 7.0), KCl (10 mM), EDTA (0.5 mM), NADPH (1 mM), acetaldehyde and 3-hydroxybutanal as substrates (1 mM) and protein (20 g) in a final volume of 200 μl. Reactions were monitored by following the decrease in absorbance at 340 nm as a measure of the conversion of the co-factor NADPH (∈340 nm=6220 M−1·cm−1) to NADP+.

TABLE 11 Activity on 3- Activity on hydroxybutanal acetaldehyde Target Genome GI (nmol/10 min) (nmol/10 min) ATC2766 Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 17936691 0.5 ATC5198 Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 17938783 0.1 BCE0216 Bacillus cereus ATCC 10987 42779297 2.2 BCE2100 Bacillus cereus ATCC 10987 42781166 0.2 BCE4166 Bacillus cereus ATCC 10987 42783212 1.2 BCE5206 Bacillus cereus ATCC 10987 42784252 2.3 BH2158 Bacillus halodurans 15614721 2.7 BH3849 Bacillus halodurans 15616411 5.1 0.7 BH3927 Bacillus halodurans 15616489 0.5 BSU0278 Bacillus subtilis 2632563 0.1 BSU0415 Bacillus subtilis 2632715 0.2 BSU0953 Bacillus subtilis 2633288 6.6 0.2 BSU2901 Bacillus subtilis 2635370 1.7 BSU3337 Bacillus subtilis 2635853 3.1 BSU3974 Bacillus subtilis 2636524 −0.3 HP1173 Helicobacter pylori 15645807 −1.6 LB0084 Lactobacillus brevis na 5.7 1.0 LB0246 Lactobacillus brevis na 5.0 1.0 LB0352 Lactobacillus brevis na 0.5 LB0782 Lactobacillus brevis na 1.0 LB1055 Lactobacillus brevis na 0.8 LB1274 Lactobacillus brevis na 0.5 LB1646 Lactobacillus brevis na 0.9 LB1760 Lactobacillus brevis na 0.2 LB1888 Lactobacillus brevis na 0.3 PA1127 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 15596324 10.7 0.4 PA2535 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 15597731 0.2 PA3795 Pseudomonas aeruginosa 15598990 0.4 PP3637 Pseudomonas putida KT2440 26990382 0.6 PS0338 Pseudomonas syringae tomato DC3000 28867581 3.0 PS3111 Pseudomonas syringae tomato DC3000 28870354 0.1 PS3612 Pseudomonas syringae tomato DC3000 28870855 1.2 PS5316 Pseudomonas syringae tomato DC3000 28872559 −0.5 RP2139 Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGA009 39935219 2.1 TSTM2268 Salmonella typhimurium LT2 16765732 1.7 YST4865 Saccharomyces cerevisiae 6322556 0.4 YST7394 Saccharomyces cerevisiae 6325384 0.5

A candidate reductase from Pseudomonas aeroginosa (PA1127) was chosen because it showed significant activity against 3HB but no activity against acetaldehyde.

The product of the PA1127 reductase-catalyzed reaction was identified using HPLC according to the following method: HPX-87H column, 60° C., 0.4 mL/min, and 5 mM H2SO4. The peaks were detected using an RI detector. The following standards were first ran: 1,3-BDO eluted at 28.46 min, acetaldehyde at 27.46 min, and 3HB at 23.35 min. A reaction mixture was prepared by mixing 55 mM of 3HB, also containing about 38 mM of acetaldehyde, and the reductase enzyme 60 mg of PA1127 in 100 mM TEA buffer at pH 7.5. At various time points, an aliquot of the reaction mixture was analyzed using HPLC. In presence of the enzyme PA1127, 3HB was consumed over time with a simultaneous increase in 1,3-BDO concentration, while acetaldehyde concentration remained constant. No conversion of 3HB to 1,3-BDO was detected in the negative control (TABLE 12), thus verifying the specificity of PA1127 towards 3HB.

TABLE 12 acetaldehyde concentration 3HB concentration 1,3-BDO concentration t = 0 min t = 190 mins t = 0 min t = 190 mins t = 0 mins t = 190 mins Control 38.51 mM 38.05 mM 58.40 mM 60.16 mM 0 0 Sample 36.92 mM 36.29 mM 54.49 mM 28.25 mM 0.85 mM 20.43 mM

Example 5: In Vitro Validation of 1,3-BDO Pathway

In order to test the activity of the aldolase and reductase enzymes together, a coupled enzyme reaction was performed using the following method: DERA from B. halodurans and reductase from P. aeroginosa were tested in a 0.6 mL reaction mixture containing 25 mM acetaldehyde, 60 mg of DERA, 60 mg of reductase, and 20 mM of NADPH in 100 mM TEA buffer at pH 7.5. At various time points, aliquots of each reaction mixture were analyzed using HPLC similarly to the method described in Example 4. The results are summarized in TABLE 13.

Acetaldehyde concentration decreased over time with a simultaneous increase in 1,3-BDO. No reaction products, either 3113 or 1,3-BDO, were identified in the negative control without enzymes. Due to the high volatility of acetaldehyde, some was lost during the reaction. The remaining reacted acetaldehyde may have been converted to the double, sequential aldol condensation product (2,4,6-trideoxy-D-erythro-hexapyranoside), which could not be identified by HPLC due to the lack of available standard for verification.

TABLE 13 acetaldehyde concentration 1,3-BDO concentration t = 0 min t = 150 mins t = 0 mins t = 150 mins Control 40.42 mM 38.20 mM 0 0 Sample 38.14 mM 25.18 mM 0 3.27 mM

Example 6: In Vivo Validation of 1,3-BDO Pathway in Wild Type E. coli

The vector backbone used for the expression of the 1,3-BDO pathway genes was pTrc99a with inducible lacI promoter and with ampicillin resistance. Three genes, required for expression of PDC, DERA, and AKR, were assembled into the expression vector. Each DNA part was flanked with unique nucleotide sequences (UNS) [Orella, J. P., Lienert, F., Boehm, C. R., Chen, J.-H., Way, J. C., & Silver, P. a. (2014). Unique nucleotide sequence-guided assembly of repetitive DNA parts for synthetic biology applications. Nature Protocols, 9(9), 2075-89]. The primers used to amplify each part is listed in TABLE 14. The DNA parts were then assembled by ligasae cycling reaction (LCR) as described in [Kok, S. De, Stanton, L. H., Slaby, T., Durot, M., Holmes, V. F., Patel, K. G., Chandran, S. S. (2014). Rapid and Reliable DNA Assembly via Ligase Cycling Reaction. ACS, 3, 97-106] using ssDNA bridging oligos that have a 5′ homologous region to the 3′ UNS of one part, and a 3′ homologous region to the 5; UNS of the consecutive DNA part. Briefly, the DNA parts were first amplified by PCR using Q5© high-fidelity DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) following manufacturer's protocol. The PCR products were then digested with DpnI to digest the template plasmid by adding 1 μL of DpnI enzyme to each 50 μL reaction mixture and incubating at 37° C. for 1 hour, then at 85° C. for 20 min. The PCR product were then purified using a PCR purification kit purchased from Thermo Scientific and performed according to manufacturer's protocol. After purification, the DNA parts were phosphorylated using T4 polynucleotide kinase (PNK) (New England Biolabs). (Alternatively, one can order phosphorylated primers to avoid this step). Briefly, a 20 μL phosphorylation reaction was prepared containing 10 U of T4 PNK, 100 fmol of each purified DNA part, 5 mM ATP, in ampligase thermostable reaction buffer diluted to 1× in water. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37° C. for 1 hour then at 65° C. for 20 min. Following phosphorylation, a 25 μL of ligase cycling reaction mixture was prepared by adding 15 μL of phosphorylation mixture, 1 μL of ampligase thermostable reaction buffer, 30 nM of each oligo bridge, 8% v/v DMSO, 0.45M betaine, 0.3 U/μL of Ampligase thermostable DNA ligase, diluted in water to make up 25 μL. The following temperature cycle was used: 2 min at 94° C., 50 cycles of: 10 s at 94° C., 30 s at 55° C., 60 s at 66° C., then 4° C. forever. Transformation of 50 μL chemically competent (alternatively, electrocompetent cells may also be used) E. coli DH10β cells was performed with 5 uL of LCR mix. Colonies were then screened for correct plasmid by PCR, restriction digest, and/or sequencing. The plasmid was designated as pBD3. The constructed plasmid was introduced into the wild type E. coli MG1655. The resulting strain was designated as ecBD-6.

The ecBD-6 strain was characterized in triplicates by two-phase, fed-batch fermentation. The seed cultures were prepared by inoculating 5 mL of LB (supplemented with 100 μg/mL carbencillin) with a single colony then grown over night at 37° C. on a rotary shaker set to 250 rpm. Then 50 mL of TB supplemented with 100 μg/mL of carbenicillin was inoculated with the overnight culture and grown aerobically at 30° C. until the optical density at 600 nm reached 0.6. Protein expression was then induced with 1 mM IPTG. After five hours of protein expression, the cells were pelleted and re-suspended in 25 mL of minimal salts media (M9 salts media) containing 3% (w/v) glucose at a high cell density. The fermentation was carried out in sealed 250 mL baffled flasks at 37° C. Glucose was fed again at a concentration of 15 g/L at 20 and 50 hours from the start of fermentation. At various time points, samples were taken to determine the cell optical density at 600 nm. The concentration of substrate and products were determined by HPLC analysis using Dionex Ultimate-3000 HPLC system equipped with UV and refractive index detectors. The column used was Aminex HPX-87H with 5 mM H2SO4 as the eluent and operated at 36° C. After 93 hours of fermentation, ecBD-6 produced 1.42 g/L of 1,3-butanediol.

TABLE 14 shows primers used for assembly of plasmid pBD3 expressing the 1,3-BDO pathway genes, including PDC from Zymomonas mobilis, DERA from Bacillus halodurans, and AKR from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The vector backbone, pTRC99a was also amplified with primers containing UNS. The four DNA parts were then assembled by ligase cycling reaction.

TABLE 14 Primer name Sequence ID F-pTrc-UNS8 29 R-pTrc-UNS1 30 F-BH1352-UNS2 31 R-DERA-UNS3 32 F-PA1127-UNS4 33 R-PA1127-UNS5 34 F-PDC-UNS6 35 R-PDC-UNS7 36

Example 7: Construction of Pyruvate-Accumulating Strain

As pyruvate is the first metabolite in the 1,3-butanediol pathway, increasing 1,3-butanediol production requires a host organism that can accumulate pyruvate. The latter represents a key metabolite in the central carbon metabolism of most common microorganisms. In E. coli, pyruvate is the main precursor to several native fermentative by-products (FIG. 2). To produce high titres of pyruvate in E. coli, pathways draining pyruvate to fermentative products were deleted. Accordingly, three genes, adhE (encoding alcohol dehydrogenase), ldhA (encoding lactate dehydrogenase), and pflB (encoding pyruvate formate lyase), were deleted from E. coli to eliminate formation of ethanol, lactate, and formate, respectively FIG. 2). The gene deletions were sequentially transferred from the corresponding single gene deletion mutants from KEIO collection to the wild type strain using P1 transduction method. The gene deletions were confirmed using PCR using the primers provided in the sequence listing: F-adhE-check and R-adhE-check (Sequence ID 37 and 38), F-ldhA-check and R-ldhA-check (Sequence ID 39 and 40), F-pflB-check and R-pflA-check (Sequence ID 41 and 42). The resultant strain with three gene deletions was designated as LMSE-25.

The strain LMSE-25 was characterized on mineral medium containing 15 g/L glucose, 3.5 g/L of (NH4)2HPO4, 5 g/L of K2HPO4, and 3.5 g/L of KH2PO4, 0.25 g of MgSO4.7 H2O, 15 mg CaCl2.2 H2O, 0.5 mg of thiamine, and 1 ml of trace metal stock. The trace metal stock was prepared in 0.1 M HCl and consisted of per liter: 1.6 g of FeCl3, 0.2 g of CoCl2.6 H2O, 0.1 g of CuCl2, 0.2 g of ZnCl2.4 H2O, 0.2 g of NaMoO4, and 0.05 g of H3BO3 (Causey, T. B., Zhou, S., Shanmugam, K. T. & Ingram, L. O. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 825-832). The characterization was carried out in 500 ml fermenters with pH controlled at 7.0 using 4 M KOH and air sparging for dissolved oxygen control (>70%).

The control wild-type E. coli did not accumulate detectable amount of pyruvate, whereas the mutant strain produced a maximum titer of 0.67 g/L in 5 hours representing a 20% of the maximum theoretical yield from glucose.

Example 8: Construction of Strain ecBD-5

The strain ecBD-5 was constructed by introducing the plasmid pBD3 in the pyruvate producing strain LMSE-25. The 1,3-butanediol-producing E. coli strain (ecBD-5) thus produced was characterized by fed-batch fermentation using glucose as the carbon source and performed under semi-aerobic conditions. The strain was first cultivated at 30° C. in 50 mL of rich medium (Terrific Broth) in 250 mL baffled flasks to express the pathway proteins. After five hours of protein expression, the cells were pelleted and re-suspended in 25 mL of minimal salts media (M9 salts media) containing 3% (w/v) glucose at a high cell density. The fermentation was carried out in sealed 250 mL baffled flasks at 37° C. Glucose was fed again at a concentration of 15 g/L at 20 and 50 hours from the start of fermentation. This experiment was performed in triplicates.

At various time points, samples were taken to determine the cell optical density at 600 nm. The concentration of substrate and products were determined by HPLC analysis using Dionex Ultimate-3000 HPLC system equipped with UV and refractive index detectors. The column used was Aminex HPX-87H with 5 mM H2SO4 as the eluent and operated at 36° C.

After 93 hours of fermentation, ecBD-5 produced 2.1 g/L of 1,3-BDO, whereas the control ecBD-6 produced 1.42 g/L of 1,3-BDO. 

1-25. (canceled)
 26. A non-naturally occurring microorganism that produces 1,3-butanediol (1,3-BDO) from 3-hydroxybutanal, the microorganism being engineered to express an exogenous polynucleotide encoding an aldo-keto reductase (AKR) comprising an amino acid sequence at least 85% identical to SEQ ID NO: 25, wherein the AKR catalyzes reduction of the 3-hydroxybutanal to 1,3-BDO.
 27. The non-naturally occurring microorganism of claim 26, wherein the AKR comprises an amino acid sequence at least 90% identical to the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:
 25. 28. The non-naturally occurring microorganism of claim 26, wherein the AKR comprises residues R214, R227, R281, Q285, G279, and R208, with respect to the amino acid numbering of SEQ ID NO:
 25. 29. The non-naturally occurring microorganism of claim 26, which is further engineered to express at least one further exogenous polynucleotide encoding a decarboxylase that catalyzes the decarboxylation of pyruvate to yield acetaldehyde and carbon dioxide.
 30. The non-naturally occurring microorganism of claim 29, wherein the decarboxylase is pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC), benzoylformate decarboxylase (BFD), or alpha-ketoacid decarboxylase (KDC).
 31. The non-naturally occurring microorganism of claim 29, which is further engineered to express at least one further exogenous polynucleotide encoding an aldolase that catalyzes condensation of two acetaldehydes to produce 3-hydroxybutanal.
 32. The non-naturally occurring microorganism of claim 31, wherein the aldolase is a deoxyribose-5-phosphate aldolase (DERA).
 33. The non-naturally occurring microorganism of claim 26, which is further engineered to delete or disrupt an enzyme that utilizes pyruvate, as compared to a corresponding non-engineered microorganism.
 34. The non-naturally occurring microorganism of claim 26, which is further engineered to increase acetaldehyde production, as compared to a corresponding non-engineered microorganism.
 35. A non-naturally occurring microorganism that produces 1,3-BDO from 3-hydroxybutanal, the microorganism being engineered to express an exogenous polynucleotide encoding an enzyme that catalyzes reduction of the 3-hydroxybutanal to 1,3-BDO, wherein said enzyme is a variant of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa AKR, said Pseudomonas aeruginosa AKR comprising an amino acid sequence at least 95% identical to the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:
 25. 36. The non-naturally occurring microorganism of claim 35, wherein said variant Pseudomonas aeruginosa AKR enzyme comprises residues R214, R227, R281, Q285, G279, and R208, with respect to the amino acid numbering of SEQ ID NO:
 25. 37. The non-naturally occurring microorganism of claim 35, which is further engineered to express at least one further exogenous polynucleotide encoding a decarboxylase that catalyzes the decarboxylation of pyruvate to yield acetaldehyde and carbon dioxide.
 38. The non-naturally occurring microorganism of claim 35, wherein the decarboxylase is pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC), benzoylformate decarboxylase (BFD), or alpha-ketoacid decarboxylase (KDC).
 39. The non-naturally occurring microorganism of claim 35, which is further engineered to express at least one further exogenous polynucleotide encoding an aldolase that catalyzes condensation of two acetaldehydes to produce 3-hydroxybutanal.
 40. The non-naturally occurring microorganism of claim 39, wherein the aldolase is a deoxyribose-5-phosphate aldolase (DERA).
 41. The non-naturally occurring microorganism of claim 35, which is further engineered to delete or disrupt an enzyme that utilizes pyruvate, as compared to a corresponding non-engineered microorganism.
 42. The non-naturally occurring microorganism of claim 35, which is further engineered to increase acetaldehyde production, as compared to a corresponding non-engineered microorganism.
 43. A method for producing 1,3-BDO from 3-hydroxybutanal, the method comprising: (a) culturing the non-naturally occurring microorganism as defined in claim 26 under conditions and for a sufficient period of time to produce 1,3-BDO; and (b) isolating the 1,3-BDO produced.
 44. A method for producing 1,3-BDO from 3-hydroxybutanal, the method comprising: (a) culturing the non-naturally occurring microorganism as defined in claim 35 under conditions and for a sufficient period of time to produce 1,3-BDO; and (b) isolating the 1,3-BDO produced.
 45. A method for producing 1,3-BDO from 3-hydroxybutanal, the method comprising contacting 3-hydroxybutanal with an aldo-keto reductase (AKR) comprising an amino acid sequence at least 85% identical to SEQ ID NO: 25, wherein the AKR catalyzes reduction of the 3-hydroxybutanal to 1,3-BDO. 